Re: [Tagging] contact:* for review websites

2017-09-16 Thread Élisée Reclus
Am 16.09.2017 um 15:25 schrieb marc marc: > and maybe it makes sense only for review system where you can retrieve > the note from an id. systems where you have to go to their own website > are unusable from an osm search (find a hotel close by with a 4 star review) All three services provide

[Tagging] contact:* for review websites

2017-09-16 Thread Élisée Reclus
Tom Pfeifer wrote: > I have seen a few mappers recently adding > contact:[ yelp | tripadvisor | foursquare ] > to businesses. > > IMHO these are not means of contact, instead these are review websites. While > I personally think > that we do not need them in OSM at all, they certainly do not

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Homeless Shelter

2010-09-04 Thread Élisée Reclus
Am 04.09.2010 07:05, schrieb John Smith: I'll try to dig up the thread, however someone had come up with a more generic shelter idea, since there is more than one kind, and I'm not talking about mountain shelters. social=homeless_shelter social=womens_shelter Also: social=hospice

Re: [Tagging] craft= Proposal

2010-08-24 Thread Élisée Reclus
Am 24.08.2010 10:08, schrieb Peter Körner: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:MaZderMind/Key:craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:MaZderMind/DE:Key:craft Are artists, computer experts, fashion designers, funeral directors and photographers really craftsmen? There could also be a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Healthcare

2010-08-24 Thread Élisée Reclus
Am 24.08.2010 11:19, schrieb John Smith: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare Would be nice to get a review. Please add suggestions to the wiki talk pages in english. Can someone translate the rest of the page into english please... It's already bilingual.

Re: [Tagging] craft= Proposal

2010-08-24 Thread Élisée Reclus
Am 24.08.2010 13:24, schrieb Peter Körner: What, there is no beauty in my rump steak? I cant accept that, it's not true!!!1eleven11! ;) Is there? http://bfox.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/tommaso_ausili_slaughterhouse01.jpg?w=347h=521 Rly? ___

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Healthcare

2010-08-24 Thread Élisée Reclus
Am 24.08.2010 11:24, schrieb John Smith: I'd split out the specialties into sub-tags, in case some one/place has multiple: eg specialty:radiology=yes/no specialty:radiotherapy=yes/no This would mean lots of sub-tags. But most of the time there is only one speciality. speciality=* would

Re: [Tagging] craft= Proposal

2010-08-24 Thread Élisée Reclus
Am 24.08.2010 14:28, schrieb Simone Saviolo: 2010/8/24 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de: I'd like Élisée Reclus proposal better: if it sells something to end customers is a shop and not a craft. A sculptor (and an art gallery, often) ultimately hopes to sell his artwork

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Healthcare

2010-08-24 Thread Élisée Reclus
Am 24.08.2010 14:28, schrieb John Smith: A lot/most of the specialists in regional areas here share office space, same with major hospitals, they would have many specialists in the same place. In my opinion speciality is not to list all hospital departments (?) in an hospital=* tag. But if

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Healthcare

2010-08-24 Thread Élisée Reclus
Am 24.08.2010 14:44, schrieb Élisée Reclus: Am 24.08.2010 14:28, schrieb John Smith: A lot/most of the specialists in regional areas here share office space, same with major hospitals, they would have many specialists in the same place. In my opinion speciality is not to list all hospital

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Healthcare

2010-08-24 Thread Élisée Reclus
Am 24.08.2010 14:44, schrieb Élisée Reclus: an hospital=* tag. But if you map the hospital departments separately s/hospital=*/healthcare=hospital/ ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Healthcare

2010-08-24 Thread Élisée Reclus
Am 24.08.2010 15:11, schrieb John Smith: 2010/8/24 Élisée Reclus fe-nospam-2009-03...@arcor.de: Forgot the shared office space: Wouldn't it be more useful to use more than one POI in these cases? You would search for one specific doctor (with an name=*). The name would usually be something