On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 11:18 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The 'Auto' setting may not be 'optimal' for what you want, but as a
> compromise between data bloat and resolution/accuracy it maybe better than
> a fixed time as judged by the developer/manufacture.
>
For not 'optimal' I mean
> Think your confusing two terms; resolution, accuracy
>
I understand that you mean, but check this detail: https://ibb.co/7ycFW5J
At least my impression is that the 1Sec is also more accurate. It's
obviously only a single test, and the recording happened at a different
time, so indeed it could
s is that if satellite imagery in unclear or lacks
> reference marks, mappers will usually leave features alone unless they have
> personal knowledge of an area or are working off a tasking manager.
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 8:36 AM Andrea Mazzoleni
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:27 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the intention is to indicate the error/accuracy/uncertainty then
> tag/state that. The better GPS devices give indications of this
> error/accuracy/uncertainty.
>
The big advantage of the dualband is not (only) the
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:11 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I would use "survey using high quality dualband GPS (accuracy with X m)"
> to make it clearly understandable.
>
This sounds like a good idea.
___
Hi,
I bought a tracking device that supports GPS dualband (also called dual
frequency) for high precision mapping, and I'm wondering if I can put this
information in the "source" tag.
The intention is to make future mappers consider the device precision when
doing corrections.
Here some info
