Re: [Tagging] coastline v. water

See comments below: David -- Original Message -- From: "Eric H. Christensen via Tagging" To: "tagging@openstreetmap.org" Cc: "Eric H. Christensen" Sent: 18/11/2020 20:19:51 Subject: [Tagging] coastline v. water After a few days of much work, a recent collaborative project to turn the

Re: [Tagging] Rio de la Plata edit war

-- Original Message -- From: "Christoph Hormann" To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Sent: 07/08/2020 08:27:23 Subject: Re: [Tagging] Rio de la Plata edit war I concur with a lot of your observations and like you i had essentially given up on the idea of the coastline r

Re: [Tagging] Rio de la Plata edit war

I've so far stayed out of this discussion because my final thoughts on the matter will I am sure be contentious. In no order of importance my thoughts are: 1) the idea of basing a the limit on coastline on levels of salinity or average water flows makes as little sense as trying to specify tha

Re: [Tagging] Coastline for rivers, estuaries and mangroves?

-- Original Message -- From: "Joseph Eisenberg" To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Sent: 07/09/2018 04:02:26 Subject: Re: [Tagging] Coastline for rivers, estuaries and mangroves? I've now edited the coastline in the area mentioned. I have now added natural=coastline along all the ways formi

Re: [Tagging] ferry relations

-- Original Message -- From: "wille" To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Sent: 17/08/2017 16:06:39 Subject: [Tagging] ferry relations Hello! The wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dferry says that "No relation should be used even if the key route

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - dolphin

Stephan You might want to look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Harbour#Dolphin Regards David - Original Message - From: Stephan Wolff To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2011 1:22 AM Subject: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - dolphin Hello,

Re: [Tagging] trees and waterways

- Original Message - From: "Nathan Edgars II" To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 10:45 PM Subject: Re: [Tagging] trees and waterways On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote: ... Perhaps have you a proposition

Re: [Tagging] trees and waterways

- Original Message - From: "Nathan Edgars II" To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 9:38 PM Subject: [Tagging] trees and waterways I'm wondering what the difference is between the recent discussions about trees and waterways. Here's t

Re: [Tagging] tagging towers WAS Re: tall masts supported byguywires

- Original Message - From: "M∡rtin Koppenhoefer" To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 5:51 PM Subject: Re: [Tagging] tagging towers WAS Re: tall masts supported byguywires 2010/9/11 David Groom : Personal

Re: [Tagging] tagging towers WAS Re: tall masts supported by guywires

- Original Message - From: "M∡rtin Koppenhoefer" To: "Nathan Edgars II" Cc: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 5:08 PM Subject: Re: [Tagging] tagging towers WAS Re: tall masts supported by guywires 2010/9/11 Nathan Edgars II : On Sa

[Tagging] tall masts supported by guy wires

What's the preferred way of tagging a mast like this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rowridge_from_entrance_gate_200704270010.jpg From memory I had thought it was man_made=mast, but I cant find any mention of that on the wiki. I see on the wiki there is a" man_made=tower" + "tower:type=comm

Re: [Tagging] tagging single trees

"Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 12:34 PM Subject: Re: [Tagging] tagging single trees On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:13 AM, David Groom wrote: Maybe I'm missing something in this discussion, but what exactly is so important about the fact t

Re: [Tagging] tagging single trees

- Original Message - From: "NopMap" To: Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 4:54 AM Subject: Re: [Tagging] tagging single trees Hi! M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: so 2 trees are a "cluster"? IMHO that's also agains your own intentions, because 2 trees can be as significant as one.

Re: [Tagging] Waterway direction

- Original Message - From: "Erik Johansson" To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 3:00 PM Subject: Re: [Tagging] Waterway direction On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Vincent Pottier wrote: On 01/09/2010 04:09, Anthony wrote: On Tue,

Re: [Tagging] Waterway direction

- Original Message - From: "Richard Fairhurst" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 8:13 PM Subject: Re: [Tagging] Waterway direction Nathan Edgars II wrote: Adding a oneway tag explicitly says that it flows that way. Please please don't do that. Navigable waterways do sometimes

Re: [Tagging] Reference numbers for UK Public Rights of Way

- Original Message - From: "Robert Whittaker (OSM)" To: Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 2:49 PM Subject: [Tagging] Reference numbers for UK Public Rights of Way The official record of UK Public rights of Way (Public Footpaths, Bridleways, Restricted Byways, and Byways Open to all T

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Fire_Hydrant

- Original Message - From: To: Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 9:16 AM Subject: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Fire_Hydrant Hi, Here is a proposal for a new way to tag fire hydrants. It's more precise than the old "amenity=fire_hydrant" tag and there is a very active discussion

Re: [Tagging] Coastlines and structures

> - Original Message - > From: "Peter Childs" > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:21 PM > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Coastlines and structures > > > > 2009/12/8 David Fawcett : >> I have a few questions on best/standard practices for de