Re: [Tagging] improve tagging of traffic_calming

Georg Feddern-2 wrote > If the highway=traffic_calming is obsolete in those cases - > why isn't > >> A few nodes were tagged with crossing=*, in those cases I added the tag >> highway=crossing (and kept the traffic_calming=* tag) > > highway=crossing obsolete in this cases? I just wonder if you

[Tagging] improve tagging of traffic_calming

Hi all, I've noticed that a few (940) traffic_calmings are mapped as highway=traffic_calming , most of them also have the tag traffic_calming=*, but ~ 10% did not. The vast majority (> 212000) of the nodes tagged traffic_calming=* is not also tagged highway=traffic_calming. I looked at the wiki

Re: [Tagging] roundabouts without obstacles in the middle

voschix wrote > if you are talking only about your specific example, I would say that in > this specific case we have normal roundabout which has been adapted for > the > situation of the harbour area where the centre piece has no rigid border, > but it's certainly not flat. It seems also the islan

Re: [Tagging] traffic_sign:forward=*

dieterdreist wrote >> Also funny: >> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/traffic_sign%3Aforward#values >> shows 1050 entries for the tag traffic_sign:forward=* >> (yes, "*" as value) >> >> My understanding so far is that I should see e.g. these tags on a node >> which is part of a highway: >> tr

Re: [Tagging] How to tag traffic islands ?

Dave Swarthout wrote > As for the painted "islands", I have always ignored those completely > because IMO it would serve no useful purpose to map them. Maybe I'm wrong. +1 As I wrote before in other threads, I try to clean up the highway tags, so my primary goal is to change those ways which are

Re: [Tagging] More human readable values for traffic signs

Mateusz Konieczny-2 wrote > I propose to add more like > - traffic_sign=oneway > - traffic_sign=no_stopping > - traffic_sign=no_parking I like the last two, I am not happy with traffic_sign=oneway. I fear that this might be used instead of tagging the corresponding way, on the other hand the posit

Re: [Tagging] WG: how to tag a "highway" that doesn't exist?

dieterdreist wrote >> Am 25.10.2015 um 09:03 schrieb GerdP < > gpetermann_muenchen@ > >: >> >> doesn't yet deserve a highway=proposed tag >> it would be great if the mappers would do that. > proposed highways that don't merit a proposed high

Re: [Tagging] WG: how to tag a "highway" that doesn't exist?

ttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13 > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13>* > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:55 AM, GerdP < > gpetermann_muenchen@ > > > wrote: > >> Hi Hans, >> >> I think that is part of the problem, you always h

Re: [Tagging] WG: how to tag a "highway" that doesn't exist?

s.dekryger13@ > > > wrote: > >> Thanks for getting back to me, if you have a list of them shoot it my >> way. >> I'll start working on them. >> >> *Regards,* >> >> *Hans* >> >> *http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/The

Re: [Tagging] WG: how to tag a "highway" that doesn't exist?

> *http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13 > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13>* > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:03 AM, GerdP < > gpetermann_muenchen@ > > > wrote: > >> Hi Hans, >> >> Yes, I think I need help, not only fr

Re: [Tagging] WG: how to tag a "highway" that doesn't exist?

Hi Hans, Yes, I think I need help, not only from you: I've commented many of the changesets which introduced new highway=* tags on ways which are rarely used. I learned that many of them were typos, often highway=* should be historic=* or railway=* or waterway=*. I think I can manage to cleanup t

[Tagging] tunnel=culvert

Hi all, up to now I've used tunnel=culvert http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel=culvert like this: 1) JOSM warns that a waterway and highway are crossing 2) I split the waterway into 3 parts and add tunnel=yes, layer=-1 to the short one in the middle (or split the road and add bridge=y

Re: [Tagging] how to tag a "highway" that doesn't exist?

Andy Townsend wrote >> Now, as so many before, I try to find a good tag to express this. >> Using a line with only a note tag is no good idea as QA tools >> will not like them. > > I'd suggest that if a QA tool objects to that, it's a problem with that > QA tool. :) Well, yes and no. When I star

Re: [Tagging] how to tag a "highway" that doesn't exist?

Hi all, I've contacted a few mappers and it seems that there is a need to keep some of the ways for the reason described by Mateusz below. Now, as so many before, I try to find a good tag to express this. Using a line with only a note tag is no good idea as QA tools will not like them. IMHO the