On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:00 PM, John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, wouldn't we be able to use waterway=canal, tunnel=yes (or whatever tag
we use for underground waterways)? Possibly combined with qanat=yes?
Or perhaps waterway=canal, tunnel=yes, canal=qanat?
This makes sense. It
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
When you look at the Wikipedia canal article, there is nothing remotely
similar to a qanat.
It is not, but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aqueduct_(water_supply)
looks more similar and even lists qanat as a form of aqueduct.
OK, I gathered the three ideas here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Qanat#Tagging
Any thoughts on it? Preferences?
I realized it is not easy to make a distinction between canal and
aqueduct, but we may assume that the latter is usually for drinking
water or irrigation of
Hi,
I've just created a proposal page about tagging qanats:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Qanat
I hope you will help me to find a good way of mapping these features
little known in western world :)
Cheers,
--
Michał
___
