On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When you look at the Wikipedia canal article, there is nothing remotely > similar to a qanat. It is not, but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aqueduct_(water_supply) looks more similar and even lists qanat as a form of aqueduct. Perhaps we could do it like this: waterway=aqueduct and: aqueduct=bridge — for the "usual" aqueducts placed overground on pillars, aqueduct=surface — for the ground-level ones, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Arizona_cap_canal.jpg aqueduct=qanat — for qanat However it might create confusion with already existing bridge=aqueduct. -- Michał _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
