Re: [Tagging] All European Union countries use E5/E10/B7 instead of gasoline 98/95, Diesel 10S respectively

Hello, Same in France, fuel stations have to display new naming (and most do), but old names "SP95", "SP95-E10", "SP98" and "Diesel" are still shown and will stay for many years at least. Regards, Adrien P. Le 25/01/2020 à 09:38, Frederik Ramm a écrit : Hi, On 1/25/20 08:26, Thibault

Re: [Tagging] Question about capacity:*=* on parking_space

to find 4 amenity=parking_space features inside of it which are available for disabled people. If you use capacity:disabled on both features, this might lead to double-counting. - Joseph Eisenberg On 1/17/20, PanierAvide wrote: Hello Lionel, I totally agree with that, I never understood

Re: [Tagging] Question about capacity:*=* on parking_space

Hello Lionel, I totally agree with that, I never understood this special treatment of amenity=parking_space, and so I'm using capacity:*=* with that. My use case is for disabled people parking spaces : just look for capacity:disabled=* and you're good to go, whatever it is a parking or

Re: [Tagging] [Indoor] is indoor=level walled ?

Thanks for this feedback. In these examples, I would say that there is still a clear delimitation of what outside and what is inside, so can be addressed with Simple 3D buildings modelling. My question is oriented in a particular case where you don't have a very precise delimitation of

Re: [Tagging] [Indoor] is indoor=level walled ?

Thanks for your two answers. Le 26/07/2019 à 13:02, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : are they “indoor” if there is no wall? What makes them be inside rather than outside? Are covered open spaces inside or outside? I would tend to “outside” as the climate will be similar to the climate around the

Re: [Tagging] [Indoor] is indoor=level walled ?

Hello, Thanks for your answer. The use case I have in mind is a parking building, where ground floor hasn't really any wall around it. As I use indoor=level to add information about the floor (name in particular), I was asking this to make sure this indoor=level object doesn't create any

[Tagging] [Indoor] is indoor=level walled ?

Hello, I'm currently working on a project involving editing of indoor features. Regarding Simple Indoor Tagging scheme : "indoor=level is optional and not intended for rendering purposes, but for having a place to add additional information like a floor name" So according to wiki,

Re: [Tagging] The actual use of the level tag

/consumers don't need to stick to level definition which doesn't make regarding operator naming, they can set level:ref according to what they are used to see. And we keep the level definition which makes more sense for tools. Regards, Adrien. PanierAvide Géomaticien et développeur Le 21/01

Re: [Tagging] wheelchair designated parking space tagging?

Le 10/01/2019 à 00:19, Warin a écrit : No - that is a terrible page. and the work in progress at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Handicaps/R%C3%A9f%C3%A9rentiel Much better .. but unordered. Hopefully we are using a wiki, this could be improved by anyone for sure ;-) Regards,

Re: [Tagging] wheelchair designated parking space tagging?

Hello, The french community has started months ago creating this page in order to list tags around disabilities, and how to practically map associated features (and referencing "concurrent" tags when multiple schemes exists) :

Re: [Tagging] 3d-tagging

___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- PanierAvide Géomaticien & développeur ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org h

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - CoreIndoor

values for example). Also something good is that it is fully compatible with previous way of tagging, just refining it. In my opinion, it is a good proposal :-) Regards, PanierAvide (creator of OpenLevelUp). Le 08/02/2017 à 09:09, Pavel Zbytovský a écrit : Hello, I have some points about

Re: [Tagging] Artworks inside the Louvre

egy - we're not able to recognize which are visible outside and which are not and it creates a visual mess: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/2236#issuecomment-234687333 -- PanierAvide Géomaticien & développeur ___ Tagg

Re: [Tagging] Opening hours specification

by opening_hours evaluation tool [1], which seems to be a reference. [1] http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/ Le 21/08/2015 12:36, Ruben Maes a écrit : I opened an issue[1] on this GitHub project, because it puts a colon after week, month and monthday selectors. PanierAvide replied

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - indoormark=beacon

Hello, Why don't you use the indoor key directly ? Cordially. Le 2015-07-30 11:36, Guillermo Amat a écrit : Hello My group is working on an indoor project and we have the necessity to place indoor beacons inside a building. As we are using OSM, we need a way to store all the data for any

[Tagging] Water slide as waterway

://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Extend_water_slides PanierAvide. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - playground:splash_pad

Le 19/07/2011 13:30, Matt a écrit : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/splash_pad Please comment. Thanks, Matt This proposal seems good in my opinion. Just why don't you recommend to tag it as area ? We sometime see some smaller buildings tagged as area, if a precise source