Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Education 2.0

There is the problem, not all educational institutions in country are the same. Even in countries that have very strict standards there are a lot of institutions that do not fit in current system. Some has specialities, some provide special education for people with disabilities, some provide f

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Education 2.0

You can probably have tags amenity=driving_school_category_b, amenity=dancing_teaching_center and other purely descriptional tags and it would be a mess and headache to sort and retrieve information. IMHO, it is much better to have alternative advanced tagging system from which data users can b

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Education 2.0

I assume that tags related to education that have been approved and do not have "education" key should remain (not sure what to do with unapproved tags). ISCED level already is in he proposal, however I propose this tag as optional. 13.04.2016 22:15, Marc Gemis пишет: just some other tags tha

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Education 2.0

Some of this tags has analogues in proposal, but in proposal they are put in the system. nursery=yes - could this tag be just replaced with min_age or education_level from proposal? after_school in proposal it is educational_form:fulltime_extended preschools is obviously refers to education_leve

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Education 2.0

I have made clarifications about current tags on proposal page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Education_2.0#Current_tagging_system Since education=* tags just duplicate amenity=school, college etc, they fit proposal well. Subtags like *education*:students_female

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Education 2.0

Proposal for the new more flexible and extendable education tagging system: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Education_2.0 Please, leave the comments on the discussion page. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://