probably there are higher reasons for its
existence, so don't take this seriously.
regards
herrbert74
Zsolt Bertalan
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 4/10/2011 1:09 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
>
>> PPS--In the US, "gymnasium" is definitely not
Hi all,
voting is now open for my proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Checkpoint_for_Tourism
regards
Zsolt
Herrbert74
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Oh, Gawd!
I think you are right. So my newest proposal :) would be:
checkpoint=hiking or cycling or whatever else
and instead of hiking_course=value course=value?
Zsolt
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:52 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/7/15 Zsolt Bertalan
ll me, what do you
think about it. Also about description:language.
Zsolt
Herrbert74
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Zsolt Bertalan
> wrote:
>
> > That's why we can NOT call the THING a route, trail, walk, etc. THIS
rat.hu/turamozgalmak
Sorry, no English translation. Túramozgalmak literally means tourism
movements.
The THINGs with the dotty icons are THINGs with checkpoints.
Zsolt
Herrbert74
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, SomeoneElse wrote:
> On 17/07/2011 14:48, Zsolt Bertalan wrote:
>
>> I see. Is
I see. Is hiking campaign better?
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 3:12 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
> Zsolt Bertalan wrote:
>
> > Because there is no difference. What is the difference between a rugby
> > match
> > and a rugby union match? Nothing. Both of them are a rugby match.
with only checkpoints, etc., but doesn't sound good to me as a
tagging key. It is confusing in an other way, because it covers more than I
need (hiking tours without checkpoints). Argh.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Zsolt Bertalan
>
We adopted hundreds of words from English, English have only a few Hungarian
loanwords (coach, goulash, saber, paprika, vizsla, komondor, puli, that's
it). Let's adopt this one! It's only a loan translation. :)
Zsolt
Herrbert74
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Zsolt Berta
Hi,
there is no need for path=hiking or path=footpad (unless this a road, where
you can run into highwayman, but I probably miss something).
The existing tags cover much more than I need.
Custom, undocumented tags just won't be rendered, not even on custom
renderings.
Zsolt
Herrbert74
On Sun, J
e:
> On 15/07/2011 23:17, Zsolt Bertalan wrote:
>
>> Just read my message further.
>>
>
> I did. You said "Any organisation or association can start a tourism
> movement (TM).". That's why I asked for an example, to enable a bit of
> googling. Are
Just read my message further. Basically you get a brochure at the start for
the stamps or codes and at the end you get a badge for visiting all the
checkpoints.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:57 PM, SomeoneElse
wrote:
> On 15/07/2011 22:52, Zsolt Bertalan wrote:
>
>> I couldn't fin
Jul 15, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Craig Wallace wrote:
> On 15/07/2011 18:50, Zsolt Bertalan wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:08 PM, fly > <mailto:lowflight66@**googlemail.com >>
>> wrote:
>>
>>Am 15.07.2011 15:18, sch
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:08 PM, fly wrote:
> Am 15.07.2011 15:18, schrieb Craig Wallace:
> > On 15/07/2011 13:01, Zsolt Bertalan wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> This proposal is to replace the old Stamping Point proposal.
> >>
> >>
rlaps with the description tag. Please discuss!
regards
Zsolt Bertalan
Herrbert74
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I moved the proposal to an obsolete status and started a new proposal. I
don't want to change the body of the old proposal, because I think it can
mess things up during voting. I know voting doesn't mean much, but it's
better to have a consensus than not.
Zsolt
Herrbert74
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at
s very ambiguous. :)
regards
Zsolt
Herrbert74
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Zsolt Bertalan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> voting is now open for my proposal:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/stamping_point
>
> regards
> Zsolt
> Herrbert74
>
___
Hi all,
voting is now open for my proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/stamping_point
regards
Zsolt
Herrbert74
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
if the building has already say, an amenity=pub tag (and I already
render pubs with icons)? What would be the best solution?
Zsolt
Herrbert74
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Zsolt Bertalan wrote:
> OK, I will do that!
>
> I think site relation is not a good example for a relation, b
Am 11.07.2011 16:00, schrieb Zsolt Bertalan:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I changed the status of this proposal to Proposed only today, although
> > the RFC was sent in February. Is it OK to start the voting in a few days
> > (hours)?
> > Luckily the history of the proposal
I was playing around with taginfo and run into a strange set of tags in
northern Germany. These are barriers separating opposite lanes on motorways.
There are lots of them like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/118720124
Key/tag combos are :
barrier=beam_barrier
highway=axis
visor=h
d the
proposal a little bit. Anyone with better english skills than me is welcome
to clean up the page.
If I don't receive any more comments, I send out a Request for Voting.
regards
Zsolt
Herrbert74
-- Forwarded message ------
From: Zsolt Bertalan
Date: Fri, Feb 4, 2011 a
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/stamping_point
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
22 matches
Mail list logo
