On 12.01.2015 05:45, Paul Johnson wrote:
How is this not a recycling center? I agree, perhaps the refund
namespace should be a thing, but I don't think anybody, in practice,
gives two shakes whether some teenager in the back of Fred Meyer is
counting cans out of a cart or if they're dumping
On 11.01.2015 11:37, Janko Mihelić wrote:
Dana 11. 1. 2015. 10:22 osoba Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de
mailto:andi...@t-online.de napisala je:
I feel like this would be so much simpler if the amenity tag was not
limited to vending_machines.
In Germany everything is just called
On 11.01.2015 12:50, SomeoneElse wrote:
In the UK, it isn't common - at least, I'd not heard of it before this
thread.
Interestingly, one of the links from the WP page is to a UK company
that claims to have a trademark on the term.
I see. Perhaps then it would better to use:
On 11.01.2015 14:34, Kotya Karapetyan wrote:
I like the proposal. In Germany and in the Netherlands these machines
are common and it is indeed important to know where one can find the
nearest one. They are usually not operator-specific, though the
voucher they issue can be redeemed only within
On 11.01.2015 14:11, althio althio wrote:
Building on Janko's comment, is this acceptable or lacking in some way?
amenity=shop/vending_machine/...
service:refund=yes
refund:plastic_bottles=*
refund:*=*
Only perhaps the operator=market/chain name and something to indicate
that the operator
Apparently there is no consensus what to use to indicate reverse vending
machines (RVM).
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_vending_machine
and:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Bottle_reverse_vending_machines
I therefore would like to suggest a set of tags that can be