[Tagging] Re : road side

Is there a generic term that could include shoulder and verge, 'road-side' maybe ? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Re : office=kjuilmn ?

Thing is, abbreviations lost their meaning when in lower-case. Yves ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Re : Tagging of topographic areas with a name

I understand site relation for disjoint elements, not necessarily areas, but altogether defining a fuzzy area. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Re : Hiking tracks as POIs in Brazil

And a hiking route relation with role start or entrance ? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Re : Re : Tagging of topographic areas with a name

I meant any like in any tag you want, not all :) For mountains, users might find reasonable to group peaks and ridges, but the rental holiday may feel it belongs too, and not necessarily the baker. Anyway the question is, does this belong to osm ? I already found some polygons in valleys with a

[Tagging] Re : Tagging of topographic areas with a name

Joining any kind of features into a relation would make sense to me. If someone feels that a particular feature belongs to the geographical group, then he/she will add it to the relation and its border will grow naturally, being more and more precise. Yves

[Tagging] Re : one way part of the year

All winter sport activities share the piste: prefix. Ski=crosscountry is better tagged piste:type=nordic (27000 km already mapped this way). This allows other ski related information like piste:difficulty=..., piste:grooming= See the pistemap and winter sport pages on the wiki. If tagged

[Tagging] Re : Use of the tag resort, or what else to tag two areas?

If the resort is disjoint (not in a single area), relation type=site may come handy. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site Yves - Reply message - De : Murry McEntire murry.mcent...@gmail.com Pour : tagging@openstreetmap.org Objet : [Tagging] Use of the tag resort, or what else

[Tagging] Re : informal helipads for emergency use

emergency=helipad sounds good, as the owner would probably be a little upset about just any chopper landing in his backyard in other cases. - Reply message - De : Pieren pier...@gmail.com Pour : Tag discussion, strategy and related tools tagging@openstreetmap.org Objet : [Tagging]

[Tagging] Re : As the crow flies

Could be a way with no tags member of a route relation. - Reply message - De : Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com Pour : Tag discussion, strategy and related tools tagging@openstreetmap.org Objet : [Tagging] As the crow flies Date : ven., févr. 22, 2013 12:43 On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:34

[Tagging] Re : Re : Ski resort (once again)

tools tagging@openstreetmap.org Objet : [Tagging] Re : Ski resort (once again) Date : lun., févr. 4, 2013 22:44 2013/2/4 yvecai yve...@gmail.com: Anyway, these site=piste relation members would simply be related by ... ski. Minimal tagging would be: type=site site=piste piste:type=nordic

[Tagging] Re : Re : Re : Ski resort (once again)

/feb/2013 um 22:54 schrieb yve...@gmail.com yve...@gmail.com: For nordic and downhill, two sites or a semicolon ? That is the question. IMHO put the piste:type on the route relations and put those route relations into a site relation (or group with tags) but don't repeat the piste:type

[Tagging] Re : Ski resort (once again)

) Date : dim., févr. 3, 2013 23:59 2013/2/3 yvecai yve...@gmail.com: The problem is the following: in this link, the nordic pistes belong to several interconnected 'resorts' or 'domains': http://www.pistes-nordiques.org/?zoom=13lat=46.80895lon=6.43328layers=e=falsem=raster There is the pistes