Reading the Multipolygon page in the wiki, I'm unclear as to exactly what
the current best practice is for tagging a mutipoly and its members, which
represent a city boundary that has portions of unincorporated county inside
it, like this one:
Hi,
Alan Mintz wrote:
1, Is it really correct that the relation has no tags at all? (I added the
name tag just to make it easier to find in JOSM)
As you know there's seldom a correct and incorrect in OSM. But I
would recommend to put all the tags on the relation and leave the outer
way
