This makes sense to me. In Nashville, Tennessee, USA, where I live, it is
becoming stylish for young professional people to live in downtown
apartments. These buildings usually have retail, restaurants, and/or
offices at ground level and perhaps a floor or two higher, then apartments
(flats) o
sent from a phone
> Am 31.08.2015 um 23:46 schrieb John Willis :
>
> Is there some easily understood dividing line between a "building" and a
> "high-rise building" in OSM or the real world?
I guess it is country specific, maybe even depends on the city or state. In
Germany the rule is: if
sent from a phone
> Am 31.08.2015 um 22:38 schrieb Daniel Koć :
>
> Current Simple 3D Buildings specification basically tells to slice the
> buildings with building:levels=* and building:min_level=*, so we better use
> this notation.
yes, kind of like this is the way. I must admit that I do
On Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I agree. There clearly are typologies with retail (and offices) in the ground
> floor and residential (or offices) in the upper
IMO an apartment building with shops on the first floor is still an
apartment building. Even the description of building=apartments
menti
W dniu 01.09.2015 2:20, Warin napisał(a):
I and I suspect many others are not familiar with indoor mapping ..
and the wiki does not help the beginner here. But the simple mapper
wants a tag to describe the building= .. without going into the
details of what is inside, the levels, roof ... they w
On 1/09/2015 6:38 AM, Daniel Koć wrote:
W dniu 31.08.2015 21:37, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
or different objects:
A
building:part=supermarket
level=-1
B
building:part=office_block
level=0-6
A 'good idea'.
This should be much easier to parse - and it's also 3D friendly.
Current Simple
On 31/08/2015 11:15 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 30.08.2015 um 16:43 schrieb Severin Menard :
Is there a way to tag properly buildings mixing residential and commercial uses
(typically shops on the basement opening on the street)?
What's the building typology? Shape
On 31/08/2015 11:44 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 31.08.2015 um 00:58 schrieb John Willis :
As these are so different from the multi-floor urban-mixed 3-25 story apartment
buildings with shops
3 storey buildings are normally quite different to 25 storey buildings for
> On Aug 31, 2015, at 10:44 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> 3 storey buildings are normally quite different to 25 storey buildings for
> various reasons (e.g. safety regulations, usage intensity, ...)
Is there some easily understood dividing line between a "building" and a
"high-rise bu
W dniu 31.08.2015 21:37, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
or different objects:
A
building:part=supermarket
level=-1
B
building:part=office_block
level=0-6
This should be much easier to parse - and it's also 3D friendly. Current
Simple 3D Buildings specification basically tells to slice the b
sent from a phone
> Am 31.08.2015 um 14:17 schrieb Tod Fitch :
>
> Completed, the look of the buildings is pretty recognizable from the street
> with the fairly tall retail floor below and shorter floors of obvious
> residential above. I guess it could be confused with a badly designed urban
sent from a phone
> Am 31.08.2015 um 00:58 schrieb John Willis :
>
> As these are so different from the multi-floor urban-mixed 3-25 story
> apartment buildings with shops
3 storey buildings are normally quite different to 25 storey buildings for
various reasons (e.g. safety regulations, us
sent from a phone
> Am 30.08.2015 um 17:05 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny :
>
> For example, how one is supposed to tag building constructed as church,
> that is used now for commercial purposes?
I d say it depends how the building appears now after the conversion. In doubt
I'd use church.
chee
sent from a phone
> Am 30.08.2015 um 16:43 schrieb Severin Menard :
>
> Is there a way to tag properly buildings mixing residential and commercial
> uses (typically shops on the basement opening on the street)?
What's the building typology? Shape? How many floors? Courtyard/s? Adjacent
buil
W dniu 31.08.2015 14:17, Tod Fitch napisał(a):
So building=apartments obviously is not accurate. Nor is
building=retail. Apartments here are considered commercial so I could
see a mapper using building=commercial even though OSM would frown on
that. It makes sense to me to tag that building styl
In my area there are a number of new buildings either recently completed or
still under construction that can only be described as a mixed use type: The
street level is steel and concrete construction and designed specifically for
retail. Above that are 3 to 5 wood framed floors specifically des
> On Aug 31, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think it better to bite the bullet and start sub tagging correctly ... thus
> for a retail mixed with apartments
I would still like to separate mixed use buildings there there are multiple
disparate tenants per building
What about
building=apartments
building:use=residential;commercial (or retail)
building=mixed doesn't seem to me to be a useful building tag. The building
tag should describe the type of building, not its use.
Cheers
On Monday, August 31, 2015 10:26:27 AM Warin wrote:
> On 31/08/2015 8:58 AM
On 31/08/2015 8:58 AM, John Willis wrote:
On Aug 31, 2015, at 12:05 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
uilding=commercial is quite suspect.
To me, there are 2 basic types of mixed use buildings.
mixed_use_urban
And
mixed_use_house
There are so many different combinations of retail, residential,
> On Aug 31, 2015, at 12:05 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> uilding=commercial is quite suspect.
To me, there are 2 basic types of mixed use buildings.
mixed_use_urban
And
mixed_use_house
There are so many different combinations of retail, residential, hotel, and
commercial (and in come c
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 11:43:34 -0300
Severin Menard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to tag properly buildings mixing residential and
> commercial uses (typically shops on the basement opening on the
> street)? Building=commercial is defined as "A building where
> non-specific commercial activities
Hi,
Is there a way to tag properly buildings mixing residential and commercial
uses (typically shops on the basement opening on the street)?
Building=commercial is defined as "A building where non-specific commercial
activities take place", that does not describe what are the other
activities taki
22 matches
Mail list logo
