Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-28 Thread Robert Skedgell
On 26/01/2020 12:35, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Florimond Berthoux wrote: >> How to map a continuous sidewalk or cycleway ? > > A couple of ideas were posted in connection with the London cycle > infrastructure database: > > https://github.com/cyclestreets/tflcid-conversion/issues/30 > https://gi

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-28 Thread Robert Skedgell
On 24/01/2020 10:35, Peter Elderson wrote: > highway=give_way would not map the situation, just the priority. Maybe > it's just me, but I think highway=give_way is an unclear tag. Who gives > way to who, in what direction? I imagine that is why the wiki lists direction=forward|backward as a usefu

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-28 Thread Florimond Berthoux
We do now: Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 à 23:51, Volker Schmidt a écrit : > Florimond, > > already in your otherwise interesting map that you presented in > Heidelberg, you do not consider all categories: > 1) sidewalk > (cycleway on a sidewalk ? there is no specified tag for that afaik) 2) cycleway >

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-26 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Florimond Berthoux wrote: > How to map a continuous sidewalk or cycleway ? A couple of ideas were posted in connection with the London cycle infrastructure database: https://github.com/cyclestreets/tflcid-conversion/issues/30 https://github.com/cyclestreets/tflcid-conversion/issues/16 Richard

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-25 Thread Peter Elderson
Florimond Berthoux : > No, I'm not talking about cycling on a sidewalk (I don't know why you > thought that ??), I discuss continuous sidewalk and continuous cycleway > together because it's the same layout, the same problem. > Ok, my bad. Separate tagging for continuous sidewalk and continuous c

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-25 Thread Volker Schmidt
Florimond, already in your otherwise interesting map that you presented in Heidelberg, you do not consider all categories: 1) sidewalk 2) cycleway 3) combined foot-cycleway (as sidewalk) 4) segregated foot-cycleway (as sidewalk; with separate lanes for pedestrians and bicycles) Volker On Sat, 25

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-25 Thread Florimond Berthoux
No, I'm not talking about cycling on a sidewalk (I don't know why you thought that ??), I discuss continuous sidewalk and continuous cycleway together because it's the same layout, the same problem. And I'm doing that because I'm interesting in cycling infrastructure more than others. For instance

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 25. Jan 2020, at 15:19, Peter Elderson wrote: > > Well, any crossing involves different ways crossing each other, and should be > considered from all angles involved. A way can't cross another way without > being crossed itself. the question is which way is interrup

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-25 Thread Peter Elderson
Ah, I see. You are talking about cycling on the sidewalk. Indeed, very unusual in Nederland. To me it's strange to tag continuous_sidewalk mainly for cycling. You talk of junction=continuous_sidewalk, I see no reason to even consider that. If you have a cycleway, footway or footcycleway around a r

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-25 Thread Florimond Berthoux
Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 à 15:19, Peter Elderson a écrit : > Florimond Berthoux : > >> With a table the pedestrians have to cross the road, it is the opposite >> for the continuous sidewalk that's why I'm in favor to add a new value >> > traffic_calming=continuous_sidewalk >> > > Well, any crossing

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-25 Thread Peter Elderson
Florimond Berthoux : > With a table the pedestrians have to cross the road, it is the opposite > for the continuous sidewalk that's why I'm in favor to add a new value > traffic_calming=continuous_sidewalk > Well, any crossing involves different ways crossing each other, and should be considered

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-25 Thread Volker Schmidt
Give ways: > If there is traffic sign or painting you can add a give way tag. > If there is none, you cannot add a give way, or you would interpret the > law which is not on the ground. > We have many situations of legal restrictions that we express by tagging, even though there are no explicit si

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-24 Thread Florimond Berthoux
What are the features of a continuous sidewalk ? The main feature is to have a... continuous sidewalk, which means the layout of the sidewalk is the same before, at the junction and after. If you look only at the sidewalk you would not see any difference in surface or height. (At least for the perf

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-24 Thread Hubert87
Hallo Florimon, could you eleborate the differnce between your proposal as opposed to using "traffic_calming=hump" (you mention "traffic_calming=table" on the wiki page) in conjunction with "highway=crossing" like on this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1962458951 https://www.mapillary.

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-24 Thread Marc Gemis
> So for pedestrians, you would add a node on the blue line where it crosses > the centerline of the sidewalk tagged highway=crossing, > crossing=? yes (or combine the crossing for pedestrians and cyclists into one node) and you can add a highway=give_way (or stop) near the node for the kerb as

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-24 Thread Peter Elderson
highway=give_way would not map the situation, just the priority. Maybe it's just me, but I think highway=give_way is an unclear tag. Who gives way to who, in what direction? I think it is better to tag it as a type of crossing. Can be rendered, can be routed. Best, Peter Elderson Op vr 24 jan.

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-24 Thread Volker Schmidt
In Nederland, if traffic has to cross a sidewalk to get onto a road, it > must give way to all other traffic when leaving the sidewalk. In effect, > this cancels the priority to the right. rule.That makes it different from a > zebra crossing, which does give priority to pedestrians, but does not >

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-24 Thread Peter Elderson
Same thing in Nederland. Best, Peter Elderson Op vr 24 jan. 2020 om 10:55 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > In Germany, this is how the beginning / end of living streets work: > > http://www.gablenberger-klaus.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/K-Spielstra%C3%9Fe-1.jpg > https

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-24 Thread Peter Elderson
So for pedestrians, you would add a node on the blue line where it crosses the centerline of the sidewalk tagged highway=crossing, crossing=? Vr gr Peter Elderson Op vr 24 jan. 2020 om 10:48 schreef Marc Gemis : > I made a quick sketch: > > https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/Screenshots/Screenshots

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-24 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
In Germany, this is how the beginning / end of living streets work: http://www.gablenberger-klaus.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/K-Spielstra%C3%9Fe-1.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/Drosselweg.JPG Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-24 Thread Marc Gemis
I made a quick sketch: https://photos.smugmug.com/OSM/Screenshots/Screenshots-1/i-w92ZnDZ/0/90e60837/X4/Bezuidenhoutseweg%20-%20Google%20Maps-X4.png Of course, this info is then only available for the cars following the blue road. Cycling navigation along de Bezuidenhoutseweg will not be able to ta

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-24 Thread Marc Gemis
Add a node where the way, which represents the road for the cars, crosses the cycleway. There does not have to be a way representing the cycleway. We do the same for zebra crossings for pedestrians all the time. We add the node where the path that the pedestrians have to follow crosses the road for

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-24 Thread Peter Elderson
"for instance in France a car driver crossing a sidewalk must give way > to others" says the wiki page. Presumably this is a different legal > case than at a crosswalk in France. > In Nederland, if traffic has to cross a sidewalk to get onto a road, it must give way to all other traffic when leav

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-23 Thread Peter Elderson
Op vr 24 jan. 2020 om 07:38 schreef Marc Gemis : > could this be solved with highway=crossing and a new, dedicated value > for crossing? > And you could map the kerbs before and after that crossing. > (How) would this work where sidewalks are not mapped as separate ways but with sidewalk=yes? Be

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-23 Thread Marc Gemis
could this be solved with highway=crossing and a new, dedicated value for crossing? And you could map the kerbs before and after that crossing. regards m On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 7:29 AM Peter Elderson wrote: > > YM like here? > https://www.google.nl/maps/@52.0817214,4.3213884,3a,48.3y,87.48h,9

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-23 Thread Peter Elderson
YM like here? https://www.google.nl/maps/@52.0817214,4.3213884,3a,48.3y,87.48h,90.51t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sb8Aiyn4YOsRoPIQEZWIe4w!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3Db8Aiyn4YOsRoPIQEZWIe4w%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D153.4736

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-23 Thread Nick Bolten
Hi Florimand! This is an interesting situation. Would it be possible to draw an overhead diagram of the situation in question? Also, is this a tag that could potentially go through the proposal process? It isn't in taginfo I'd be happy to help any way I can. Best, Nick On Thu, Jan 23, 2020, 12

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-23 Thread Jarek Piórkowski
On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 17:05, Volker Schmidt wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 21:11, Florimond Berthoux > wrote: >> How to map a continuous sidewalk or cycleway ? >> In order to solve this question I created a wiki page to sum up my first try >> to tag this: >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-23 Thread Volker Schmidt
How is this legally and physically different form this situation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203142300 https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/B9kqmuGy9C2qp0O86oQy5Q ? On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 21:11, Florimond Berthoux < florimond.berth...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > How to map a continuous side

[Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

2020-01-23 Thread Florimond Berthoux
Hello, How to map a continuous sidewalk or cycleway ? In order to solve this question I created a wiki page to sum up my first try to tag this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Continuous_Sidewalk The main idea is to use the tag: junction=continuous_sidewalk|continuous_cycleway on node or ways