As the key surveillance is obviously defacto approved we should write
a proper documentation for it and link it to the proposal for the
extension. And as the extension seems to be used also maybe we should
also update the status and write a documentation.
Any volunteers?
Martin
2012/10/29 Martin
2012/10/29 Martin Vonwald :
> 2012/10/29 Simone Saviolo :
>> In this case, surveillance=public. Ok.
>
> Not (yet) documented, but used: surveilance:type
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/surveillance%3Atype
>
> And there's also your camera :-)
There is a proposal for this:
http://wiki.opens
2012/10/29 Simone Saviolo :
> In this case, surveillance=public. Ok.
Not (yet) documented, but used: surveilance:type
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/surveillance%3Atype
And there's also your camera :-)
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@op
2012/10/29 Martin Vonwald
> 2012/10/29 Simone Saviolo :
> > As to the enforcement_device tag, I guess I'll have to make a proposal?
>
> Have a look at this:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:Surveillance
>
> It is already in use:
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/su
2012/10/29 Simone Saviolo :
> As to the enforcement_device tag, I guess I'll have to make a proposal?
Have a look at this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:Surveillance
It is already in use:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/surveillance#values
So maybe it would be be
2012/10/24 Simone Saviolo
> How would I go about formalizing this "proposal"? Do I need to make a
> proposal page? I'm not trying to add a feature, just to expand on one.
>
Since I've received no replies, I'll proceed to add the "access" value for
the "enforcement" key in the Enforcement Relatio
2012/10/24 Martin Koppenhoefer
> 2012/10/24 Simone Saviolo :
> > I agree, but a speed "camera" is not actually a camera.
>
>
> -1, it is, and it is combined with a device to measure the speed of the
> vehicle.
>
Ok, I see what you mean. Then I suggest something along the lines of
enforcement_de
2012/10/24 Simone Saviolo :
>> I think it would be better to have just "camera" and get the what is
>> enforced from the "enforcement"-tag. A camera is a camera.
>
>
> I agree, but a speed "camera" is not actually a camera. I hoped it would be
> possible to differentiate between an actual video cam
2012/10/24 Simone Saviolo :
> I agree, but a speed "camera" is not actually a camera.
-1, it is, and it is combined with a device to measure the speed of the vehicle.
> I hoped it would be
> possible to differentiate between an actual video camera (whose capture is
> processed to detect plate n
2012/10/24 Martin Koppenhoefer
> 2012/10/24 Simone Saviolo :
> > I wish to map the cameras that my municipality is installing these days
> to
> > enforce the access restriction in the ZTL ( = limited traffic area). I
> think
> > the most appropriate structure to do this would be the enforcement
>
2012/10/24 Simone Saviolo :
> I wish to map the cameras that my municipality is installing these days to
> enforce the access restriction in the ZTL ( = limited traffic area). I think
> the most appropriate structure to do this would be the enforcement relation
> [1], but none of the listed types o
I wish to map the cameras that my municipality is installing these days to
enforce the access restriction in the ZTL ( = limited traffic area). I
think the most appropriate structure to do this would be the enforcement
relation [1], but none of the listed types of enforcement is up to the
task.
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
