Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - footway=indoor

On 27/09/19 03:14, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Am Do., 26. Sept. 2019 um 19:03 Uhr schrieb Markus mailto:selfishseaho...@gmail.com>>: BTW, i find it very strange that there is a separte highway=* tag for indoor "flat ways" (i.e. corridors), but not for steps. Any reasons for that?

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - footway=indoor

Well indoors they become stairs. True at least in the parts of England/Wales I am from. I believe usage is different in Scotland. Phil (trigpoint) On Thursday, 26 September 2019, Markus wrote: > BTW, i find it very strange that there is a separte highway=* tag for > indoor "flat ways" (i.e. cor

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - footway=indoor

Am Do., 26. Sept. 2019 um 19:03 Uhr schrieb Markus < selfishseaho...@gmail.com>: > BTW, i find it very strange that there is a separte highway=* tag for > indoor "flat ways" (i.e. corridors), but not for steps. Any reasons for > that? > > Not sure if we need a different tag (in both cases), but f

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - footway=indoor

BTW, i find it very strange that there is a separte highway=* tag for indoor "flat ways" (i.e. corridors), but not for steps. Any reasons for that? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - footway=indoor

Hi Jeremiah, Why not highway=footway + indoor=yes? This seems to be the most used tagging for indoor ways. Current usage statistics are: highway=footway + indoor=yes: 34, 326 highway=corridor: 13, 914 highway=footway + footway=indoor: 268 indoor=footway: 210 Also note that 31.33% of all tag comb

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - footway=indoor

I've updated this RFC with some of the comments received over the last week. footway=indoor: indoor pedestrian route https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/footway%3Dindoor Thanks, Jeremiah Rose ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstree

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - footway=indoor

>I can see some value in mapping routes through a >room which is full of obstacles, but I don't like >the idea of using this where a routing graph >could be calculated from indoor=corridor/area/room >polygons just fine. >While the slow progress of OSM-based routing >engines in this regard is reg

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - footway=indoor

> How is this different from highway=corridor? The wiki for highway=corridor says that it was part of an older indoor tagging scheme, but doesn't link to that scheme, so it's hard to understand how it would fit into that scheme. The biggest difference of course is that footway=indoor tags highwa

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - footway=indoor

On 05.09.19 18:41, Jeremiah Rose wrote: > Here's a proposal for marking indoor routes within a building mapped with > Simple Indoor Tagging. I can see some value in mapping routes through a room which is full of obstacles, but I don't like the idea of using this where a routing graph could be ca

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - footway=indoor

Was going to ask the same thing, not that I don't think that both are redundant, but why have two -different- redundant tags? Am 05.09.2019 um 18:46 schrieb Leif Rasmussen: > How is this different from highway=corridor?   > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, 12:42 PM Jeremiah Rose > wro

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - footway=indoor

How is this different from highway=corridor? On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, 12:42 PM Jeremiah Rose wrote: > Here's a proposal for marking indoor routes within a building mapped with > Simple Indoor Tagging. > > footway=indoor: indoor pedestrian route > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - footway=indoor

Here's a proposal for marking indoor routes within a building mapped with Simple Indoor Tagging. footway=indoor: indoor pedestrian route https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/footway%3Dindoor Jeremiah Rose ___ Tagging mailing list Tag