Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Temperature=

2015-03-25 Thread Warin
On 12/03/2015 9:20 PM, Kotya Karapetyan wrote: Warin, you have a 50/50 split. Maybe it's better to try to address the issues and re-vote the proposal? We could have a good tag, but we are going towards a barely accepted one. My main concern is not even that we don't have the vast majority

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Temperature=

2015-03-12 Thread Kotya Karapetyan
Warin, you have a 50/50 split. Maybe it's better to try to address the issues and re-vote the proposal? We could have a good tag, but we are going towards a barely accepted one. My main concern is not even that we don't have the vast majority support, but that the proposal hasn't provided a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Temperature=

2015-03-12 Thread Warin
I'll summarise at the end. A clear statement of any opposition, its number on any one point and potential resolution/s or rebuttals can be made then. I'd rather get a good indication of any problems and ideas to go forward through the voting system now that it has started rather than

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Temperature=

2015-03-11 Thread Warin
Well a summary at ~ 2 weeks Total votes 15. Approvals 7. So it is close. Please vote! In another week I've evaluate the votes and proceed from there. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Temperature=

2015-02-26 Thread Warin
On 26/02/2015 8:33 PM, Kotya Karapetyan wrote: Hi Warin, Why rush? I don't think it's a question of how long the discussion took. The proposal still has open issues, some of which are even mentioned in the proposal page itself. So what are we voting for? I missed this bit Just to be

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Temperature=

2015-02-26 Thread Kotya Karapetyan
Hi Warin, Why rush? I don't think it's a question of how long the discussion took. The proposal still has open issues, some of which are even mentioned in the proposal page itself. So what are we voting for? It would be better to close the open issues (or at least remove the options that cause

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Temperature=

2015-02-26 Thread Warin
On 27/02/2015 9:03 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: The 'adjustable' value has been criticised as having no limits ... the suggestion is to use a sub tag say for example adjustable:range=cold

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Temperature=

2015-02-26 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: The 'adjustable' value has been criticised as having no limits ... the suggestion is to use a sub tag say for example adjustable:range=cold to hot. That would need another proposal. Pull it all into one coherent proposal,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Temperature=

2015-02-26 Thread Warin
On 26/02/2015 8:33 PM, Kotya Karapetyan wrote: Hi Warin, Why rush? I don't think it's a question of how long the discussion took. The proposal still has open issues, some of which are even mentioned in the proposal page itself. So what are we voting for? It would be better to close the open

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Temperature=

2015-02-24 Thread Warin
Hi, Well it has been 3 weeks for the comments .. a few changes/modifications, thanks for those. Time now to vote... Review the whole page - from the top https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Temperature Or go straight to voting