Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

No, I have expanded it to cover all educational institutions now, primary focus being separating cram schools, as cram schools are usually not allowed to award a diploma and they should not be listed when searched for other education institutions. 20-11-2017 14:19 tarihinde Marc Gemis yazdı: >

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

What is the difference with the rejected Education 2.0 proposal from 2016 ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Education_2.0 Aren't we repeating all the arguments again ? m. On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > 2017-11-20

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

2017-11-20 11:04 GMT+01:00 Erkin Alp Güney : > > > What about dance / music (singing / instruments, ...) / schools? > > Academies? Conservatories? Professional schools? > education=specialty > I'm not convinced. Why is there an education=driving or administrative, but an

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

> What about dance / music (singing / instruments, ...) / schools? > Academies? Conservatories? Professional schools? education=specialty > Subtags how to tag the specialization (if any), about the degress you > can get, institutes and faculties, etc.). These tags already exist. Institutes and

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

2017-11-19 12:19 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole : > While I'm a bit undecided on if we need an education reform at all and > you need to make clear what the voting is actually on, the underlying > proposal is far from ready for any kind of vote or usage at this point > in time. > I agree

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

They prepare for academic exams but a cram school's purpose of existence is not actual academic education. They do not teach, they cram, just as their name implies. They employ various preparation for multiple-choice or other tests and memorization techniques for "mastering" these tests. A

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

I think a bit like Simon and Christoph, but if the goal is to vote on the opportunity of a reform, I'd stay open about the final scheme. Yves Le 19 novembre 2017 12:19:48 GMT+01:00, Simon Poole a écrit : > >[Christoph pressed send before I did, sigh] > >While I'm a bit

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

You are right, I meaned *specialty schools*. Somehow I mixed lines in my copt-paste. But the definition, as it appears in the proposal, keeps being confusing, since you include "exam preparation but not cramming" into specialty schools. Cramming is some kind of exam preparation, so maybe you

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

[Christoph pressed send before I did, sigh] While I'm a bit undecided on if we need an education reform at all and you need to make clear what the voting is actually on, the underlying proposal is far from ready for any kind of vote or usage at this point in time. You need to at least provide a

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

On Saturday 18 November 2017, Erkin Alp Gc3bcney wrote: > I am offering this proposal into voting as no replies arrived since > last month. I just had a look over your draft and i like your approach although as others have said it is not quite clear why the change is needed for many

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

That school is non-religious for OSM tagging purposes. 19-11-2017 01:31 tarihinde José G Moya Y. yazdı: > Also, a note about > optional religion =* > > In Spain the government pays some religious institutions for giving > educational

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

You have conflated test centers and specialty schools. Test centers, as in my proposal, focus exclusively on _performing_ the standardised tests. I do not know where in the world we have these, but we have a government-operated one in Ankara, Turkey (ÖSYM computer-based examination building). Cram

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

On 18/11/2017 22:31, José G Moya Y. wrote: The proposal says: education=testcenter - If it does, then it needs to be adapted to the convention of using British English spelling: the 'center' bit should be 'centre'. And I can't imagine anyone in the UK writing 'testcentre' as a single

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

You numbers look slightly off, wit: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=childcare Am 18.11.2017 um 19:05 schrieb Erkin Alp Güney: > I am offering this proposal into voting as no replies arrived since last > month. > > Yours, faithfully > Erkin Alp > > >

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

Yes, I agree, good idea Thanks Graeme On 19 November 2017 at 08:31, José G Moya Y. wrote: > I will vote +1 because I liked your proposal in September > > But please refresh me, what's the difference between testcenter and > cram-school? I only remember cram-school in your

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

I will vote +1 because I liked your proposal in September But please refresh me, what's the difference between testcenter and cram-school? I only remember cram-school in your proposal this September. The proposal says: education=testcenter - Specialty schools including exam preparation >

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

This version is considered for voting: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/Education_Reform_Alternative 18-11-2017 21:05 tarihinde Erkin Alp Güney yazdı: > I am offering this proposal into voting as no replies arrived since last > month. > > Yours, faithfully > Erkin Alp >

[Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

I am offering this proposal into voting as no replies arrived since last month. Yours, faithfully Erkin Alp ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging