Re: [Tagging] How about a Fork? Re: The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag

2018-06-08 Thread Simon Poole
Am 08.06.2018 um 11:53 schrieb marc marc: > Le 08. 06. 18 à 11:34, Rory McCann a écrit : >> Replicate data from OSM, applying your data transformation programme > it's already what nearly all use of osm is doing. > it's named "preprocessor" or alias > it's waste that nearly all data use need to

Re: [Tagging] How about a Fork? Re: The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag

2018-06-08 Thread Daniel Koć
W dniu 08.06.2018 o 11:34, Rory McCann pisze: > Yes it takes a lot of work, but what you're proposing is going to take > work anyway, so why not try? Well, you've said it - because it's a lot of work. :-) It would be much easier to set up an alternative rendering server with an trivial osm-carto

Re: [Tagging] How about a Fork? Re: The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag

2018-06-08 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Friday 08 June 2018, Rory McCann wrote: > > One way to try this could be to fork OSM? It's open data, go for it. > As unlikely as it is that this will actually happen yes, this would be a very good idea. As Frederik has said there were projects competing with OSM following a more

Re: [Tagging] How about a Fork? Re: The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag

2018-06-08 Thread marc marc
Le 08. 06. 18 à 11:34, Rory McCann a écrit : > Replicate data from OSM, applying your data transformation programme it's already what nearly all use of osm is doing. it's named "preprocessor" or alias it's waste that nearly all data use need to build their own list.

[Tagging] How about a Fork? Re: The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag

2018-06-08 Thread Rory McCann
On 08/06/18 01:29, EthnicFood IsGreat wrote: I wouldn't mind if all the existing tags were replaced tomorrow with a brand new set of "intelligently-designed" keys.  And I wouldn't mind if these keys were enforced from now on.  And I wouldn't mind that I would have to relearn all the tagging I