Re: [Tagging] Lanes tag, way forward

2011-09-28 Thread Pieren
2011/9/22 Kytömaa Lauri lauri.kyto...@aalto.fi: Sorry if I raise the discussion again but our documentation about lanes still doesn't clarify our position on how we count lanes (e.g. psv lanes) and turning lanes: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes (3) Few days back there were, globally,

Re: [Tagging] Lanes tag, way forward

2011-09-28 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Pieren wrote: Am I the only one who think that the turnlanes plugin is splendid but unworkable for average contributors, reserved to one editor (JOSM) and resulting data (relations) obscure/opaque/cryptic for humans ? No, you're certainly not the only person who thinks that! cheers

Re: [Tagging] Lanes tag, way forward

2011-09-25 Thread Anthony
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote: How does this sound for a compromise? Many ways are not tagged with the total number of lanes at all points, but only with the number of through lanes. Therefore, end users should treat the lanes tag as a minimum

Re: [Tagging] Lanes tag, way forward

2011-09-23 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 9/23/2011 11:00 AM, Kytömaa Lauri wrote: [etc.] If you're unwilling to compromise, the present status quo will remain. Good day. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging