Re: [Tagging] Missing oneway:bicycle=no

2017-02-15 10:27 GMT+01:00 Volker Schmidt : > I do read the wiki page > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway > differently. > I read it to mean that the "opposite" refers to the opposite *direction* > in which bicycles can travel on roads marked as oneway for

Re: [Tagging] Missing oneway:bicycle=no

This is not what is mentioned on other pages: (part of my mail to the Belgian mailing list) oneway:bicycle=no + cycleway=track/lane is recommended, see e.g. M1 on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle opposite_lane should only be used when there is a lane in the opposite direction of the

Re: [Tagging] Missing oneway:bicycle=no

@Martin On 14 February 2017 at 23:40, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > cycleway=opposite* indicates that the cycleway is on the "other" side, > e.g. left of the street in a right side traffic region. This doesn't > require a oneway situation and missing oneway tags are not

Re: [Tagging] Missing oneway:bicycle=no

sent from a phone > On 14 Feb 2017, at 17:33, André Pirard wrote: > > Unfortunately, while writing an overpass script I noticed that many > cycleway=opposite* exist without oneway:bicycle=no and even without > oneway=yes. > Please run this script to find some of

[Tagging] Missing oneway:bicycle=no

I once read that routes of cyclists using OSM were laughed at by the others... oneway=yes is a routing tag (used by GSM) indicating that only one way of the highway can be used. That page says that the exception for bicycles to run contraflow is