Hi,
On 6/29/19 08:05, "Christian Müller" via Tagging wrote:
> The intriguing question is:
Please (again!), move this to legal-talk or elsewhere. It has no place
on the tagging list.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
The intriguing question is:
Does use of OSM in commercial products make
OSM a commercial product? IMHO it does not.
This would blow any license like PD, BSD, etc.:
Just because companies /use/ what's available
on an open basis, doesn't change the status of
the objects used. The OSM foundation
At this point the discussion should really be continued
(a) under another subject and
(b) on a different mailing list (maybe legal-talk?)
Bye
Frederik
On 26.06.19 07:16, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> 26 Jun 2019, 00:01 by tagging@openstreetmap.org:
>
> in particular for non-commercial and
26 Jun 2019, 00:01 by tagging@openstreetmap.org:
> in particular for non-commercial and scientific use
>
This are not relevant at all, OSM data is not restricted in how it can be used.
> I don't know to what extent this is applicable for an international
> project such as OSM, but there are
ational aspect of OSM.
>
>
> Greetings
> cmuelle8
>
> [1]
> https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/BJNR012730965.html#BJNR012730965BJNG004800123
>
>
>
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 um 12:19 Uhr
> > Von: "Frederik Ramm"
> > An: tagging@
30965.html#BJNR012730965BJNG004800123
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 um 12:19 Uhr
> Von: "Frederik Ramm"
> An: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] My ban by user Woodpeck = Frederik Ramm
>
> You cannot continue to use one inadmissible source and then
Hello Ulrich,
this is offtopic here but I'd like to say something anyway since you
started the discussion here.
Your are blocked from editing until we can trust you to respect our
rules. This is a process that has to happen in your head. I would have
hoped that you understood the issue but time
25 Jun 2019, 11:18 by f...@zz.de:
>
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:16:18AM +0200, Ulrich Lamm wrote:
>
>> This way, my mapping of courses of water including the culvert
>> sections does not violate the principles of OSM. And the ban is
>> totally injust.
>>
>
> It violates the
Hi Ulrich,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:16:18AM +0200, Ulrich Lamm wrote:
> This way, my mapping of courses of water including the culvert
> sections does not violate the principles of OSM. And the ban is
> totally injust.
It violates the rights of the origin copyright holder. CC-BY-SA and
On Tuesday 25 June 2019, Ulrich Lamm wrote:
> Ten hours ago, user Woodpeck = Frederik Ramm has banned me for TEN
> YAERS! For what?
> For mapping courses of water.
> Before, he had blocked me or using database data.
> [...]
For competeness of information and for everyone to properly assess this,
Besides being off-topic here, 99.9% of the background is missing.
Perma-bans for contributors in OSM are extremely rare and definitely not
imposed lightly, just as they are not in this case: see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ulamm/blocks for just a tiny bit of
the very long story behind this.
Le 25.06.19 à 10:16, Ulrich Lamm a écrit :
> the ban is totally injust.
add injust=maybe
or
find a better place to talk about not-related-to-tags stuff
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Ten hours ago, user Woodpeck = Frederik Ramm has banned me for TEN YAERS!
For what?
For mapping courses of water.
Before, he had blocked me or using database data.
I ceased to enter figures that were available from databasaes only.
Then he blocked me for using figures from PDFs that could be
13 matches
Mail list logo
