Re: [Tagging] Pubs with accommodation

2015-09-29 Thread Jerry Clough (SK53)
Because a guest house with a bar is different from a pub with rooms. At least in Britain only residents would be allowed to buy drinks at a guest house bar. As an aside, there may be a problem here with br-en "guest house" and "Gasthof", the latter being better translated as br-en "inn". I

Re: [Tagging] Pubs with accommodation

2015-09-29 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-09-29 16:09 GMT+02:00 Jerry Clough (SK53) : > Because a guest house with a bar is different from a pub with rooms. At > least in Britain only residents would be allowed to buy drinks at a guest > house bar. > +1 > > As an aside, there may be a problem here with

Re: [Tagging] Pubs with accommodation

2015-09-28 Thread Philip Barnes
On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 16:25 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > sent from a phone > > Am 28.09.2015 um 13:45 schrieb Philip Barnes : > > > > Is it acceptable to combine amenity=pub & tourism=hotel? > > I think so, then whichever is searched will be returned. > > > In

Re: [Tagging] Pubs with accommodation

2015-09-28 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone Am 28.09.2015 um 13:45 schrieb Philip Barnes : >> Is it acceptable to combine amenity=pub & tourism=hotel? > I think so, then whichever is searched will be returned. In some cases I would prefer to have 2 different objects here, as many

Re: [Tagging] Pubs with accommodation

2015-09-28 Thread Andy Townsend
On 28/09/2015 15:24, Georg Feddern wrote: Am 28.09.2015 um 14:46 schrieb Andy Townsend: Depends on the pub, I'd say. Some places are both a hotel and a pub, some have essentially separate "hotel" and "pub" bits (for which 2 nodes within a building might work) and some (e.g.

Re: [Tagging] Pubs with accommodation

2015-09-28 Thread Georg Feddern
Am 28.09.2015 um 14:46 schrieb Andy Townsend: Depends on the pub, I'd say. Some places are both a hotel and a pub, some have essentially separate "hotel" and "pub" bits (for which 2 nodes within a building might work) and some (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/75844692 ) are pubs

Re: [Tagging] Pubs with accommodation

2015-09-28 Thread Philip Barnes
On Mon Sep 28 12:09:29 2015 GMT+0100, Dave F. wrote: > Hi > > How should public houses (inns) that provide accommodation be tagged? > 'Accommodation=*' with only 249 examples doesn't appear to to be the tag > to use. Is it acceptable to combine amenity=pub & tourism=hotel? > I think so, then

[Tagging] Pubs with accommodation

2015-09-28 Thread Dave F.
Hi How should public houses (inns) that provide accommodation be tagged? 'Accommodation=*' with only 249 examples doesn't appear to to be the tag to use. Is it acceptable to combine amenity=pub & tourism=hotel? Cheers Dave F. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus

Re: [Tagging] Pubs with accommodation

2015-09-28 Thread Andy Townsend
On 28/09/2015 12:45, Philip Barnes wrote: On Mon Sep 28 12:09:29 2015 GMT+0100, Dave F. wrote: Hi How should public houses (inns) that provide accommodation be tagged? 'Accommodation=*' with only 249 examples doesn't appear to to be the tag to use. Is it acceptable to combine amenity=pub &