Re: [Tagging] Relations in Transport for London: network and operator

Hi all, thanks for comments. Makes me think about validation. Is there a validator that can be used to compare the accepted schemes to what the actual tagging is? For example, is it possible to validate against manually constructed schemes in JOSM? Is it possible to view osmose errors on certain

Re: [Tagging] Relations in Transport for London: network and operator

2016-07-14 12:53 GMT+02:00 Kieron Thwaites : > Yes, it's two different tagging schemes. "station=subway" belongs to > the legacy station mapping scheme, while "subway=yes" belongs to the > more detailed (and more complex) public transport schema, and is (or > should

Re: [Tagging] Relations in Transport for London: network and operator

On 14 July 2016 at 12:24, Bjoern Hassler wrote: > (1) both "line" and "tube" are in use to designate lines (e.g. > "Piccaddilly;Bakerloo"). Only one of them tends to be filled. I assume this > should all be "line"? I'd actually tag this as the name=* of the route_master

Re: [Tagging] Relations in Transport for London: network and operator

Hi all, hi Kieran, hi Richard, Another question: Looking at the stations, (1) both "line" and "tube" are in use to designate lines (e.g. "Piccaddilly;Bakerloo"). Only one of them tends to be filled. I assume this should all be "line"? (2) Also, I assume the ";" as a separator is correct? I.e.

Re: [Tagging] Relations in Transport for London: network and operator

Bjoern Hassler wrote: > Second question: network. The wiki page > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/London_public_transport_tagging_scheme > doesn't say much about "network", and these values are in use: > > - London Underground > - National Rail > - Network Rail > - London Overground > - TfL > -

[Tagging] Relations in Transport for London: network and operator

Hi all, (Cross-posting to tagging and talk-gb-london.) I've been looking at type=public_transport public_transport=stop_area relations in Transport for London. *First question: operator. *Should this be "Transport for London" or the actual operator? TfL owns and retains branding control, but