Re: [Tagging] Should greenhouse et al have building=yes? (was building=digester)

On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Joachim wrote: > And I'm surprised about your proposal amenity=greenhouse ;) It's a bad > tag since a greenhouse is not an amenity. It's usage count is around > 300, please don't promote. > Agree. A greenhouse is not an amenity. If plants

Re: [Tagging] Should greenhouse et al have building=yes? (was building=digester)

> On May 21, 2016, at 6:43 PM, Martin Simon wrote: > > Some are tent-like, some have a rigid steel structure that supports itself. This is an interesting question. In my area, there are thousands of greenhouses, or as they are called in Japanese “Vinyl Houses” (Vinyl

Re: [Tagging] Should greenhouse et al have building=yes? (was building=digester)

2016-05-22 10:31 GMT+02:00 Volker Schmidt : > I am surprised by his long discussion > > Two (extreme) examples: > http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/70186603/ > amenity=greenhouse > building=no > > http://www.ortobotanicopd.it/il-giardino-della-biodiversit%C3%A0 >

Re: [Tagging] Should greenhouse et al have building=yes? (was building=digester)

I am surprised by his long discussion Two (extreme) examples: http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/70186603/ amenity=greenhouse building=no http://www.ortobotanicopd.it/il-giardino-della-biodiversit%C3%A0 amenity=greenhouse building=yes The two tags are orthogonal. On 22 May 2016 at

Re: [Tagging] Should greenhouse et al have building=yes? (was building=digester)

I see, but the extra building is probably caused by the fact that a man_made area is not rendered in many cases. (which was also mentioned by traveling_salesman during the discussion why added building=digester Is building=yes a good addition, or should we add building=windmill to

Re: [Tagging] Should greenhouse et al have building=yes? (was building=digester)

On 21/05/2016 06:37, Marc Gemis wrote: No, I wouldn't expect that, but I would expect e.g. windmill, watermill and lighthouse to be displayed as building as well. I couldn't find those in your style. I'm talking about mills where work and living are often combined into one. Maybe this is a

Re: [Tagging] Should greenhouse et al have building=yes? (was building=digester)

If it's not a temporary structure (some greenhouses are only set up when they are needed), it should be tagged as building=greenhouse, imho. As Martin already noted, there are different types. Some are tent-like, some have a rigid steel structure that supports itself. Can I ask a silly question at

Re: [Tagging] Should greenhouse et al have building=yes? (was building=digester)

sent from a phone > Il giorno 21 mag 2016, alle ore 07:37, Marc Gemis ha > scritto: > > but I would expect e.g. windmill, > watermill and lighthouse to be displayed as building as well +1 ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Should greenhouse et al have building=yes? (was building=digester)

sent from a phone > Il giorno 21 mag 2016, alle ore 01:20, Andy Townsend ha > scritto: > > If a greenhouse is a greenhouse, regardless of whether or not it has a > building tag in OSM, surely it doesn't matter whether or not it is tagged > building=yes? a greenhouse

[Tagging] Should greenhouse et al have building=yes? (was building=digester)

Can I ask a silly question at this stage - taking something like a greenhouse, would someone ever treat it differently depending on whether it has a building tag or not? In my case when trying to figure out how to render things like this the answer was "no":