I am surprised by his long discussion Two (extreme) examples: http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/70186603/ amenity=greenhouse building=no
http://www.ortobotanicopd.it/il-giardino-della-biodiversit%C3%A0 amenity=greenhouse building=yes The two tags are orthogonal. On 22 May 2016 at 07:59, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see, but the extra building is probably caused by the fact that a > man_made area is not rendered in many cases. (which was also mentioned > by traveling_salesman during the discussion why added > building=digester > > Is building=yes a good addition, or should we add building=windmill > to man_made=windmill. > In which case we repeat the same information. What do you think ? > > regards > > m > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 21/05/2016 06:37, Marc Gemis wrote: > >> > >> No, I wouldn't expect that, but I would expect e.g. windmill, > >> watermill and lighthouse to be displayed as building as well. I > >> couldn't find those in your style. I'm talking about mills where work > >> and living are often combined into one. Maybe this is a country > >> specific view ? > > > > > > When I looked at the data (in the UK) those items either already had > > building=yes tagged on them or were just mapped as nodes (where a > building > > tag is essentially irrelevant for rendering). > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Andy > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
