On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:33 PM, James Mast wrote:
> I was just thinking, here in the USA, we sometimes have exit ramps that
> after they split from the main highway, split again (sometimes with separate
> exit #'s). One such example would be Exit #1B-1C (old #7A-7B) on I-279 here
> in Pittsburg
Well, I'm working up an official proposal for this right now. Will updating
this thread and also send out a RFC once it's done. ;)
-- James
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.open
On 5/16/2011 10:39 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
isn't this information a router could gain from the data simply by
looking where the ramp leads to?
Not necessarily. What's a router to do with exit_to=Downtown?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@opens
On 5/16/11 10:39 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
isn't this information a router could gain from the data simply by
looking where the ramp leads to?
yes, a router could. i think that this proposal would be useful
as a way to indicate the text visible on the signs for the ramp
for clear directions
isn't this information a router could gain from the data simply by
looking where the ramp leads to?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I was just thinking, here in the USA, we sometimes have exit ramps that after
they split from the main highway, split again (sometimes with separate exit
#'s). One such example would be Exit #1B-1C (old #7A-7B) on I-279 here in
Pittsburgh, PA.
(Google StreetView examples from when the exits
