Re: [Tagging] Very large multipolygons

2017-05-02 12:10 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann : > I agree there is no point in mapping this kind of feature as > multipolygons in OSM but i disagree that changing type=multipolygon to > type=boundary makes it any better. > +1 I thought about how this kind of feature could be

Re: [Tagging] Very large multipolygons

On Tuesday 02 May 2017, Frederik Ramm wrote: > [...] > > I realize that what I've done here is close to "mapping for the data > extractor" and I'm offering these decisions for discussion here. I > definitely think none of the three areas qualifies as a proper > "multipolygon" and *if* these huge

Re: [Tagging] Very large multipolygons

Am 02.05.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Frederik Ramm: Hi, I have removed three very large multipolygons from OSM today. * I DELETED a "place=sea" for the Adriatic Sea (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4590486) because I think we shouldn't even start with that kind of thing (place=ocean

[Tagging] Very large multipolygons

Hi, I have removed three very large multipolygons from OSM today. * I DELETED a "place=sea" for the Adriatic Sea (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4590486) because I think we shouldn't even start with that kind of thing (place=ocean name=Atlantic anyone?). * I CHANGED a