On 2013-09-29 01:40, Clifford Snow wrote :
I wonder if anyone actually uses LibreOffice for wiki pages [visual
edition]. Learning wiki markdown takes a while. I can certainly see
the desire to have a visual editor. A visual editor could lower the
bar for contributions.
On 2013-09-27 13:51, André Pirard wrote :
On 2013-09-17 21:49, Rob Nickerson wrote :
Daniel wrote:
- Make it easier to edit the wiki.
Hi Daniel,
I agree - the wiki can be hard to edit if you have never done this
before. This is why I requested a visual editor (that is now used by
Ouch, from LibreOffice menu and help, it looks like it's only able to
store a wiki file, not to read and edit it.
Pretty much useless.
André.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:38 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
Only gotcha, I think: recent Ubuntu comes with a desktop called Unity
which is very resource consuming, dancing but not singing, and is really
crawling on VB. There are solutions to tame
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 2:56 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
Ouch, from LibreOffice menu and help, it looks like it's only able to
store a wiki file, not to read and edit it.
Pretty much useless.
Not sure - on my version of LibreOffice, I can connect to
wiki.openoffice.org
On 2013-09-29 00:50, Clifford Snow wrote :
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:38 PM, André Pirard
a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Only gotcha, I think: recent Ubuntu comes with a desktop called
Unity which is very resource consuming, dancing but not singing,
On 2013-09-17 21:49, Rob Nickerson wrote :
Daniel wrote:
- Make it easier to edit the wiki.
Hi Daniel,
I agree - the wiki can be hard to edit if you have never done this
before. This is why I requested a visual editor (that is now used by
Wikipedia) to be added. Unfortunately this
Rob,
I'm not sure I'd rush into it, anyway. Even granted that en.wikipedia
probably uses more complex markup and templates than we do, uptake of the
visual editor (among new editors and otherwise) doesn't seem very high, and
no one outside of the WMF seems very impressed by its current state of
Quote:
I'm not sure I'd rush into
it, anyway. Even granted
that en.wikipedia
probably uses more complex
markup and templates than we
do, uptake of the
visual editor (among new
editors and otherwise)
doesn't seem very high, and
no one outside of the WMF
seems very impressed by its
current state of
Daniel wrote:
- Make it easier to edit the wiki.
Hi Daniel,
I agree - the wiki can be hard to edit if you have never done this before.
This is why I requested a visual editor (that is now used by Wikipedia) to
be added. Unfortunately this requires an update to the version of MediaWiki
that we
10 matches
Mail list logo