As minimum, openGeoDB:auto_update=* (automatic updates not performed),
openGeoDB:version=* (no sense outside of openGeoDB) and openGeoDB:layer=*
(openGeoDB internal concept) may be dropped without information loss.
22 Apr 2023 г., 12:09 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
Apr 20, 2023, 22:18 by marc_m...@mailo.com:
> Le 17.04.23 à 15:43, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :
>
>> Given how many of them are (<20 000) I think that bot edit
>> removing them would be a good idea.
>>
>
> this was also my first idea, but as a Swiss contributor is opposed
> to it,
Le 17.04.23 à 15:43, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :
Given how many of them are (<20 000) I think that bot edit
removing them would be a good idea.
this was also my first idea, but as a Swiss contributor is opposed
to it, the edition in question will not be done in Switzerland.
of
I'd recommend removing all but :loc_id, so that the ID corresponding to the
_still_ available recordset on GitLab doesn't get lost.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging :
> Given how many of them are (<20 000) I think that bot edit removing
> them would be a good idea.
>
Are you suggesting removing all or just some of them?
>
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Given how many of them are (<20 000) I think that bot edit removing
them would be a good idea.
I see a point of making tag discardable if there are say 100 000 000 uses
of it, but at this volume bot edit seems preferable over slowly removing it over
centuries as other edits are being made.
Apr
Marc_marc :
> Hello,
>
> the openGeoDB* tags were added during an import in 2008 [1] in europe
> and according to the wiki [2], the osm data maj project is long dead
> and was problematic.
> years later we still have plenty of occurrences of tag cases
> if we had to do it again, current good
Hello,
the openGeoDB* tags were added during an import in 2008 [1] in europe
and according to the wiki [2], the osm data maj project is long dead
and was problematic.
years later we still have plenty of occurrences of tag cases
if we had to do it again, current good practice would refuse to
