Re: [Tagging] pipeline flow direction; was: Feature Proposal - RFC - Pipeline Extensions

2014-11-18 Thread Rainer Fügenstein
hi, TK> I'm certainly no pipeline expert, so forgive my ignorance. Does TK> flow_direction=both mean that there actually is flow in both direction TK> at the same time or does it alternate between flow directions? the latter. the direction of the flow within the pipeline may be changed. TK> If th

Re: [Tagging] pipeline flow direction; was: Feature Proposal - RFC - Pipeline Extensions

2014-11-18 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-11-18 9:37 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny : > "while flow_direction=oneway doesn't imply any specific direction" > > It is well established that oneway=yes means "in direction of the way" and > oneway=-1 "in opposite direction than the way". yes, oneway=yes means that (vehicle)-traffic may (

Re: [Tagging] pipeline flow direction; was: Feature Proposal - RFC - Pipeline Extensions

2014-11-18 Thread SomeoneElse
On 18/11/2014 08:37, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: "while flow_direction=oneway doesn't imply any specific direction" It is well established that oneway=yes means "in direction of the way" and oneway=-1 "in opposite direction than the way". To be clear, "oneway=yes" means _traffic_ direction in

Re: [Tagging] pipeline flow direction; was: Feature Proposal - RFC - Pipeline Extensions

2014-11-18 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 17.11.2014 22:33, Rainer Fügenstein wrote: > MK> +1, also this way you give information about the direction of flow > relative > MK> to the osm way, while flow_direction=oneway doesn't imply any specific > MK> direction, it only states that the direction is not reversible. > > proposal updated

Re: [Tagging] pipeline flow direction; was: Feature Proposal - RFC - Pipeline Extensions

2014-11-18 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
"while flow_direction=oneway doesn't imply any specific direction" It is well established that oneway=yes means "in direction of the way" and oneway=-1 "in opposite direction than the way". 2014-11-17 22:33 GMT+01:00 Rainer Fügenstein : > > > MK> +1, also this way you give information about the

Re: [Tagging] pipeline flow direction; was: Feature Proposal - RFC - Pipeline Extensions

2014-11-17 Thread Rainer Fügenstein
MK> +1, also this way you give information about the direction of flow relative MK> to the osm way, while flow_direction=oneway doesn't imply any specific MK> direction, it only states that the direction is not reversible. proposal updated in this regard. __

Re: [Tagging] pipeline flow direction; was: Feature Proposal - RFC - Pipeline Extensions

2014-11-17 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-11-15 22:47 GMT+01:00 fly : > The major advantage about backward/forward is the editor support once > the way direction is reversed. > > +1, also this way you give information about the direction of flow relative to the osm way, while flow_direction=oneway doesn't imply any specific directio

Re: [Tagging] pipeline flow direction; was: Feature Proposal - RFC - Pipeline Extensions

2014-11-15 Thread fly
Am 15.11.2014 um 22:38 schrieb Rainer Fügenstein: > > f> Found one more, loop=* > f> Some month ago we were talking on this list about flow of waterways and > f> pipelines. > > f> The far I remember flow_direction=forward/backward/both was mentioned to > f> tag the direction a pipeline or canal i

Re: [Tagging] pipeline flow direction; was: Feature Proposal - RFC - Pipeline Extensions

2014-11-15 Thread Rainer Fügenstein
hi hi f> Found one more, loop=* f> Some month ago we were talking on this list about flow of waterways and f> pipelines. f> The far I remember flow_direction=forward/backward/both was mentioned to f> tag the direction a pipeline or canal is used. agreed; it is better to define a tag that can al