Re: Warning about slight non-equivalence between "." and "[]"

> "Shawn" == Shawn Bayern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Shawn> On 22 Jul 2002, David M. Karr wrote: >> The specification states that the "." and "[]" operators are >> equivalent. This is essentially true. However, it would be useful to >> point out there are some situations wh

Re: Warning about slight non-equivalence between "." and "[]"

On 22 Jul 2002, David M. Karr wrote: > The specification states that the "." and "[]" operators are > equivalent. This is essentially true. However, it would be useful to > point out there are some situations where you could get dramatically > different results from two expressions using these

Warning about slight non-equivalence between "." and "[]"

The specification states that the "." and "[]" operators are equivalent. This is essentially true. However, it would be useful to point out there are some situations where you could get dramatically different results from two expressions using these two operators. The basic prototypical example

Test - please ignore

Filler for the really curious people. Justy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

ultradev4-tutorial; Integration in Dreamweaver fails

Dear all, I have problems to get the custom tag library extension for ultradev running...;-( I followed the documentation ( http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/doc/ultradev4-doc/index.html ), but when I press 'Use Tag Libraray' in the Dreamweaver it takes some time before answering: ' not fou