On Thursday, February 13, 2003, at 05:04 PM, Pierre Delisle wrote:
The change that Jeff is proposing, although of interest, would
unfortunately break compatibility with the spec.
(sorry guys, but the Expert Group ain't perfect)
Why would extending the empty keyword to support Collections brea
I have a subclass of ArrayList that exposes its own property,
userObject.
class NamedList extends ArrayList {
Object _userObject;
public NamedList(Object userObject) {
_userObject = userObject;
}
public Object getUserObject() {
retu
I wonder why the unnecessary complication here? If they are going to use
reflection anyway, why subject the users to creating these extra xml
fragments. A nickname hardly seems worth it, and adding another point
where a slight syntax problem in an XML document can cause additional
time deploying a
Lot of acronyms.
What is the tie-in between JSP 2.0 and the Expression Language? It seems
to have been introduced in a "low-power" version in the JSTL 1.0 spec,
but I am reading that it will support function-type calls when JSP 2.0
is released?
Is JSP 2.0 going to include a newer version of JSTL
