2 4:21 PM
> To: Tag Libraries Users List
> Subject: Re: Beefing up JSTL EL in JSP 2
>
>
> On a somewhat related note, I've been wondering if the
> EL-functions as
> discussed here shouldn't have an implicit pageContext argument.
>
> For
On a somewhat related note, I've been wondering if the EL-functions as
discussed here shouldn't have an implicit pageContext argument.
For instance, if the TLD specified a function like:
isUserInRole
mypkg.MyFunctions
boolean isUserInRole(PageContext, String)
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Stefan wrote:
> Is it the eventual aim to eliminate the use of the in
> JSP, replacing them with taglibs?
It's hard to answer that question in general. From my perspective,
there's little reason to use as of JSTL 1.0, though there
are exceptions: is useful to instantiat
Is it the eventual aim to eliminate the use of the in JSP,
replacing them with taglibs?
Stef
- Original Message -
From: "Shawn Bayern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tag Libraries Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:10 PM
Subjec
> -Original Message-
> From: Hans Bergsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:26 PM
> To: Tag Libraries Users List
> Subject: Re: Beefing up JSTL EL in JSP 2
>
>
> Martin Cooper wrote:
> >
> >>-Original Messa
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Wolfgang Röckelein wrote:
> I see that, too. JSP/JSTL/EL is DO and not OO. However, the decision
> remains how to deal with user input submissions which usually require
> some action (if it is not merely a change in a display format etc.,
> but e.g. a new entry, a changed ord
Hi,
just adding my cents...
Gideon, Thomas wrote:
> Maybe it's just me but I don't see JSP as intrinsically OO. Even if one
> tries to cram them, incorrectly in my mind, into the category of a 4GL
> technology. JSP as it relates to HTML, and even to a large extent XML, is
> about document orie
D]
www.B2eMarkets.com
> -Original Message-
> From: V. Cekvenich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Beefing up JSTL EL in JSP 2
>
>
> With methods... one could say object.do() (and do OO
With methods... one could say object.do() (and do OO) as oposed to
do(Object). The guide line for OO is noun.verb().
I wish it was methods.
Shawn Bayern wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, James Cook wrote:
>
>
>>I wonder why the unnecessary complication here? If they are going to
>>use reflection a
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, James Cook wrote:
> I wonder why the unnecessary complication here? If they are going to
> use reflection anyway, why subject the users to creating these extra
> xml fragments. A nickname hardly seems worth it, and adding another
> point where a slight syntax problem in an XM
I wonder why the unnecessary complication here? If they are going to use
reflection anyway, why subject the users to creating these extra xml
fragments. A nickname hardly seems worth it, and adding another point
where a slight syntax problem in an XML document can cause additional
time deploying a
Martin Cooper wrote:
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Hans Bergsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>
>>Shawn is rarely wrong, but here actually missed one detail:
>>JSP 2.0 adds
>>_functions_ to the EL, but not _methods_ as is used in this example.
>>A function is a method on a specific class
Shawn Bayern wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, James Cook wrote:
> [...]
>>Will this new, improved EL support reflection-like function calls, and
>>will we be able to:
>>
>>${mybean.customer(${page.range} * 2)}
>
>
> Yes, though the syntax will work differently from what you have
> assumed; it will
When are these changes due out ?
S
- Original Message -
From: "Hans Bergsten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tag Libraries Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: Beefing up JSTL EL in JSP 2
> Shawn Bayern wr
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, James Cook wrote:
> What is the tie-in between JSP 2.0 and the Expression Language? It
> seems to have been introduced in a "low-power" version in the JSTL 1.0
> spec, but I am reading that it will support function-type calls when
> JSP 2.0 is released?
The JSP 2.0 Proposed
Lot of acronyms.
What is the tie-in between JSP 2.0 and the Expression Language? It seems
to have been introduced in a "low-power" version in the JSTL 1.0 spec,
but I am reading that it will support function-type calls when JSP 2.0
is released?
Is JSP 2.0 going to include a newer version of JSTL
> -Original Message-
> From: Hans Bergsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 4:52 PM
> To: Tag Libraries Users List
> Subject: Re: Beefing up JSTL EL in JSP 2
>
>
> Shawn Bayern wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, James Cook wrote
gt;
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 7:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Beefing up JSTL EL in JSP 2
>
>
>
>>Shawn Bayern wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, James Cook wrote:
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>>Will this new, improved EL support reflection-like fun
18 matches
Mail list logo
