they don't know about the problem.
Thanks!
Keith
-- Original Message ---
From: Justyna Horwat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tag Libraries Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:54:13 -0700
Subject: Re: More SQL Date problems
Hans,
I looked into the SQ
-- Original Message ---
From: Justyna Horwat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tag Libraries Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:54:13 -0700
Subject: Re: More SQL Date problems
Hans,
I looked into the SQL problem and consulted with the JDBC
specification lea
Apr 2004 11:24:32 -0700
Subject: Re: More SQL Date problems
> Keith,
>
> That's why they have the compatibility tests to avoid the very problem
> that you are seeing with the Oracle driver. This is definitely a bug in
> Oracle's driver implementation that needs to be fixe
hey don't
know about the problem.
Thanks!
Keith
-- Original Message ---
From: Justyna Horwat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tag Libraries Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:54:13 -0700
Subject: Re: More SQL Date problems
Hans,
I looked into the SQ
Justyna Horwat wrote:
Hans,
I looked into the SQL problem and consulted with the JDBC specification
lead, Jonathan Bruce. Jonathan said that what JSTL is doing is correct:
when setObject(index, null) is passed in a null value this should be
converted by the driver to an SQL null.
This behavior
using for whoever may take over for me in the future if they
don't
know about the problem.
Thanks!
Keith
-- Original Message ---
From: Justyna Horwat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tag Libraries Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:54:13 -0700
Subj
Hans,
I looked into the SQL problem and consulted with the JDBC specification
lead, Jonathan Bruce. Jonathan said that what JSTL is doing is correct:
when setObject(index, null) is passed in a null value this should be
converted by the driver to an SQL null.
This behavior is in fact enforced a
I just got that "prohibited content" email myself. All I'm sending is plaintext email.
Is that something from the mailing list doing it? Snipped Hans' original message out
and
am resending...
Thanks a lot, Hans! Yeah, I had seen a workaround like that would work. I groaned when
I
realized th
d, 31 Mar 2004 12:18:19 -0800
Subject: Re: More SQL Date problems
> Wolfgang Röckelein wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > at JDBC level there are two different possibilities to set a parameter
> > value to null: with setNull and setting to null. Depending on the driver
> > some
Wolfgang Röckelein wrote:
Hi,
at JDBC level there are two different possibilities to set a parameter
value to null: with setNull and setting to null. Depending on the driver
sometimes only on of these methods work, and when it does not work, you
see the "java.sql.SQLException: Invalid column ty
Hi,
at JDBC level there are two different possibilities to set a parameter value to
null: with setNull and setting to null. Depending on the driver sometimes only
on of these methods work, and when it does not work, you see the
"java.sql.SQLException: Invalid column type" error you see.
I thin
a:534)
-- Original Message ---
From: "Martin van Dijken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tag Libraries Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:58:24 +0200
Subject: RE: More SQL Date problems
> Hmm Keith,
>
> Can you specify the url you&
t and I've not had
any headaches with it.
Martin
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 31 maart 2004 5:55
Aan: Tag Libraries Users List
Onderwerp: Re: More SQL Date problems
Yeah, I'd read about not using that bridge driver. I'm
Sent: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:40:41 -0800
Subject: Re: More SQL Date problems
> Keith wrote:
> > Ahhh, ok. I assumed it was the JSTL stuff throwing the error. I've not done much
> > programming in actual Java, which is why I'm using the JSTL library.
> >
> > The f
es Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 19:30:44 -0800
Subject: Re: More SQL Date problems
Keith wrote:
Now I'm thorougly confused. I could've sworn this was working before (as I claimed
in my
first email to the group.
INSERT INTO resource_registry ( do
Message ---
From: Hans Bergsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tag Libraries Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 19:30:44 -0800
Subject: Re: More SQL Date problems
> Keith wrote:
> > Now I'm thorougly confused. I could've sworn thi
Keith wrote:
Now I'm thorougly confused. I could've sworn this was working before (as I claimed in my
first email to the group.
INSERT INTO resource_registry ( dob )
VALUES (? )
This works perfectly fine when I put a date in the format specified in the parseDate
action. The
Now I'm thorougly confused. I could've sworn this was working before (as I claimed in
my
first email to the group.
INSERT INTO resource_registry ( dob )
VALUES (? )
This works perfectly fine when I put a date in the format specified in the parseDate
action. The JSP
18 matches
Mail list logo