I think I agree with all of this. For JSTL 1.0, we opted to be a bit
conservative since the need didn't yet strongly present itself. It
wouldn't surprise me if a future version can add support for headers and
HTTP POST; that might represent the knee in the curve, so to speak,
between convenience
I'm not sure where it should reside to be honest. I can see argument for
both sides. If I wanted to access data that resides on an IIS machine
that has challenge/response turned on, it would be good to have
cookie/auth support in jstl but one could easily argue it
should be in a bean to provide
Shawn Bayern wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, peter lin wrote:
>
>
>
>>in the interest of discussion. I find it useful to have cookie,
>>user-agent and other advanced capabilities in a web services context.
>>As web services becomes more common place, supporting those features
>>might become very
The Jakarta Commons HttpClient has been usefull to me on a limited basis.
All I really use it for is for building "Multipart File Posts". And to
do that I even had to use a Class someone wrote which is not in the
HttpClient package right now. The nice thing about the package is that I
can buil
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Henri Yandell wrote:
> I'm sure I could look this up myself, but it might be nice to have it
> in the archives with this thread.
>
> Which jar is needed if I want to add EL to my taglib. Without having
> to include the whole JSTL implementation?
This is tricky and in flux.
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, peter lin wrote:
> in the interest of discussion. I find it useful to have cookie,
> user-agent and other advanced capabilities in a web services context.
> As web services becomes more common place, supporting those features
> might become very important.
But is it import
I'm sure I could look this up myself, but it might be nice to have it in
the archives with this thread.
Which jar is needed if I want to add EL to my taglib. Without having to
include the whole JSTL implementation?
Hen
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Shawn Bayern wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Mark R. Di
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
> On another note, I've been playing around with Taglibraries for some
> time now. I'd like to integrate the EL Engine into my libraries, from
> what I understand it is now going to be part of the JSP 2.0 spec as
> well. How might I go about integrat
in the interest of discussion. I find it useful to have cookie,
user-agent and other advanced capabilities in a web services context.
As web services becomes more common place, supporting those features
might become very important.
peter lin
Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> Isn't this the kind of th
Thank you, I will post my comments there as well.
On another note, I've been playing around with Taglibraries for some
time now. I'd like to integrate the EL Engine into my libraries, from
what I understand it is now going to be part of the JSP 2.0 spec as
well. How might I go about integratin
Well, the Jakarta Taglibs "IO Taglib" is a pretty good offering. I think
Mark was just hoping for a standard solution.
--
Shawn Bayern
"JSTL in Action" http://www.jstlbook.com
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Isn't this the kind of thing that Jakarta Commons HttpClient specialise
Isn't this the kind of thing that Jakarta Commons HttpClient specialises
in? In which case a taglib for that would be a pretty nice affair...
[I assume there's not one already..]
Hen
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Shawn Bayern wrote:
> Indeed - JSTL 1.0 does not support advanced HTTP operations from wit
Indeed - JSTL 1.0 does not support advanced HTTP operations from within
JSP pages using (e.g., basic authentication, free modification
of headers), but a future version of JSTL could if there were enough
perceived need. As Peter says, it's a good idea to inform the expert
group if you'd like to
I'm assuming you want to get at things like cookies, user-agent and
other http header data.
you may want to make a request to the expert group, so that it is
included in the next version of JSTL. I believe the current
importsupport class just uses standard url & httpurlconnection classes.
shawn
Now that I have your attention. We are continually working with managing
headers in our URL object requests to get resources from different
locations. Is there really any way I can set the request Header info on
the URL object being created by c:import? Right now I have my own custom
implement
15 matches
Mail list logo
