Rick wrote:
> Thanks Rahul for the info. I'm wondering which would have
> less overhead behind the scenes... using the replace like
> you have it above or storingwhat I want to replace in
> a temp var? The reason I ask is this operation will have
> to actually be repeated several times within
Rahul P Akolkar wrote the following on 3/7/2005 6:51 PM:
Conceptually, a fn:join is a better fit here, but I'm not too keen on
creating arrays in JSPs ;-) Finally, if temporary variables is what you're
after, 'theField' would be the next in line, although readability has its
own benefits.
Than
> trying to convert String "field." to type "java.lang.Double"
> I even tried using the fn:trim tag which is supposed to return a String
In short, the spec says so :-)
Remember, + is not string concatenation in JSPs, it is an arthmetic
operator. The rogue argument here is not the index (so trim
Ok this seems weird
There is a map with some keys named
field.0.type, field.1.type etc (don't ask reasoning, I was given this:)
There is also fieldCount as a map property so I know how many of the
annoying field.X.type keys there are.
What I need to do now is loop over the count and get out t
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Shawn wrote:
> xx<%=
> currentRow_questions.get("numb") %>
>
> currentRow_questions is a scripting variable (hashtable) in DbForms
> (open source rad).
>
> However the c:out value was incorrect. Am I just an idiot who can't
> do simple things correctly or is something go
Hi,
I tried this line and thought I should get the same value but didn't:
xx<%=
currentRow_questions.get("numb") %>
currentRow_questions is a scripting variable (hashtable) in DbForms (open source rad).
However the c:out value was incorrect. Am I just an idiot who can't do simple thing
