Re: [Tails-dev] thinkcentre M82 fails to boot with tails 0.23 and 1.0 -- but 1.1 UEFI alpha works

On 05/02/2014 02:10 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > I've tried booting a Lenovo Thinkcentre M82 (bios 9SKT58AUS and also > 9SKT79AUS) [...] > http://nightly.tails.boum.org/build_Tails_ISO_feature-uefi/tails-i386-feature_uefi-1.1-20140429T0733Z-02a2adf.iso > > (sha512sum > 90914e20d303e6300dcc63

[Tails-dev] thinkcentre M82 fails to boot with tails 0.23 and 1.0 -- but 1.1 UEFI alpha works

I've tried booting a Lenovo Thinkcentre M82 (bios 9SKT58AUS and also 9SKT79AUS) with tails 0.23 and 1.0 (both alpha generations, made on linux, and beta generations, made with Tails installer). I configured the bios so that it could boot from USB, and so that it would boot in "legacy" mode. Howev

[Tails-dev] Fake keys for Tails developers' email address

Hi, u. (Cc'd) has notified me of two fake keys with Tails developers' email addresses: EB24 9600 79A3 E2B9 3BFE 48B5 05F8 BB78 B38F 4311 C3BA A4BF E369 B2B8 6018 B515 0E08 AC78 06C0 69C8 These are *not* genuine. Don't trust them. Our real keys are documented on https://tails.boum.org/doc

Re: [Tails-dev] Fix ISO verification using checksum

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I actually had that issue with the ISO. Just didn't like the way I had to use FireFox to verify it. Instead I just used some common sense together with the linux explanation and a command-line (cmd.exe) window open in Windows. The windows installer f

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/update_whisperback_help

Alan wrote (02 May 2014 13:25:53 GMT) : > Is there a ticket for that? No idea. Time to create one, perhaps, if we don't want to get back to it in another year :) > I'm lost I suggest reading the beginning of the thread: https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2013-June/003116.html > and fa

[Tails-dev] Fix ISO verification using checksum

Here is another bug that would be quite important to fix on the website. The instructions that we propose to verify the ISO image on Windows and OS X have been basically broken for months: https://tails.boum.org/doc/get/verify_the_iso_image_using_other_operating_systems/#index1h3 I gave up on hop

Re: [Tails-dev] lifrera 1.10.3 backport for wheezy?

Hi, > I am working on the packaging for 1.10.6 right now. This release > should contain fixes for both bugs and will be targeted towards > unstable. After a couple weeks we can then backport it to Wheezy if > there aren't any new issues. > I just worked on our liferea feature including your backp

[Tails-dev] Create a donation form to receive fiat currencies

Hi everybody, I've had this on my plate for several months now, but I still haven't managed to tackled it. I'm probably too busy with 1.0, 1.1, etc. But since new people appeared on this list with good will to work on the website, here is a task that is quite concrete and would be really useful.

Re: [Tails-dev] Testing EHLO messages: simplification proposal

Hi, > > Furthermore, "non-anonymizing SMTP relay" is badly defined. > > In the context of these tests, it means a SMTP relay that writes the > IP address of the client it is relaying email for in the Received > header. > > Doing so is the most common interpretation of the relevant RFC, and > the

[Tails-dev] New logo for the installer

Hi, > On the 1.0 roadmap two things are left undone (I think): > > - #7095: Integrate the new logo in Tails Installer I was late on this one and it wasnt merged in 1.0 due to packaging issue: dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to tails-liveusb-creator/data/tails-liveusb-header.xcfbz2

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/update_whisperback_help

Hi, I'm trying to catch my old unanswsered emails and fail to understand that one... > intrigeri wrote: > > However, ./refresh-translations > > does not seem to pickup the TRANSLATORS annotation, so I got tired > > of trying and gave up, sorry. Too bad the merge request was done > > this late in

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails_4.0: Jessie ?

Hi, intrigeri wrote (09 Apr 2014 16:07:46 GMT) : > So, I propose: > * let's use the 4.0 milestone for things to do when we'll be porting > Tails to Jessie > * let's create a high priority ticket called "Get everything we need > into Debian Jessie" > * turn things like #6175 into sub

Re: [Tails-dev] Main mail address ta...@boum.org bounces back

Hi Willem, Willem van der Poel wrote (02 May 2014 07:31:55 GMT) : > The main email address ta...@boum.org has been bouncing my mail back > since yesterday. I don't think this falls in the 'bug' category :) Thanks a lot for letting us know! > : Command died with status 1: > "/usr/local/bin/sc

[Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1] #7150: feature/linux-3.14

Hi, Linux 3.14 landed in Debian unstable a few days ago. Linux 3.13 will disappear from it soonish. Presumably, we want to ship 3.14 in Tails 1.1 => please review feature/linux-3.14 and merge it into devel. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrig

[Tails-dev] Main mail address ta...@boum.org bounces back

Hello, My apologies if this isn't the location this mail should be send to. The main email address ta...@boum.org has been bouncing my mail back since yesterday. I don't think this falls in the 'bug' category :) The error I'm getting: -