Re: [Tails-dev] Tahoe-LAFS persistence

2014-06-01 Thread Leif Ryge
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:11:29AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > David Stainton writes: > > > Since Tahoe-LAFS is not a posix compliant filesystem... > > we cannot easily create a persistent volume that only > > stores data on a Tahoe grid. There is an ugly FUSE hack > > but it is extremely ineffie

Re: [Tails-dev] htpdate - Why the perl version?

2014-06-01 Thread AK
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 1:09 PM, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > AK wrote (01 Jun 2014 17:17:02 GMT) : >> OK, but note this from the htpdate website [1]: > >> "!!! no development on the Perl version is done anymore !!! " > > Thanks for the pointer. > > In practice, we've forked it years ago, after sendi

[Tails-dev] Tails Stickers

2014-06-01 Thread u
Hi, we have been working on Tails stickers containing the new logo. We'd like to suggest to print these: https://labs.riseup.net/code/attachments/download/463/tails-sticker-print-proposal.png * 1000 round stickers violet on white 5cm in diameter * 500 white on transparent rectangular stickers (n

Re: [Tails-dev] htpdate - Why the perl version?

2014-06-01 Thread intrigeri
Hi, AK wrote (01 Jun 2014 17:17:02 GMT) : > OK, but note this from the htpdate website [1]: > "!!! no development on the Perl version is done anymore !!! " Thanks for the pointer. In practice, we've forked it years ago, after sending pull requests to upstream, who never replied. The version we'

Re: [Tails-dev] htpdate - Why the perl version?

2014-06-01 Thread AK
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 3:00 AM, intrigeri wrote: > AK wrote (31 May 2014 23:53:37 GMT) : >> Just wondering why Tails decided to uses the perl version of htpdate >> rather than the C version. > > We had to modify htpdate to make it suit our needs, and it was easier > for us to modify the Perl versi

Re: [Tails-dev] Tahoe-LAFS persistence

2014-06-01 Thread Greg Troxel
David Stainton writes: > Since Tahoe-LAFS is not a posix compliant filesystem... > we cannot easily create a persistent volume that only > stores data on a Tahoe grid. There is an ugly FUSE hack > but it is extremely ineffient. This can be viewed as a bug in tahoe :-) But seriously, fixing the F

Re: [Tails-dev] Tahoe-LAFS persistence

2014-06-01 Thread David Stainton
>> 1. the Tahoe-LAFS debian package: >> >> This part is done. Great! >> > Congratulation :) > Tahoe documentation could mention this: > https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/docs/quickstart.rst OK... I volunteer to update https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/docs/quickstart.rst

Re: [Tails-dev] Macbook Wifi firmware

2014-06-01 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Jurre van Bergen wrote (01 Jun 2014 10:49:54 GMT) : > i'll try to gather some PCI-id's and e-mail it to bug report. Great, I'm sure Gaudenz won't mind feedback on his existing list of PCI ids, and possibly improvements to it :) (Context for Gaudenz: Jurre wanted to improve the b43/broadcom-s

Re: [Tails-dev] Macbook Wifi firmware

2014-06-01 Thread Jurre van Bergen
On 05/31/2014 07:47 PM, intrigeri wrote: > A resolution to this problem, for the specific case of Debian Live > systems, is being worked on: https://bugs.debian.org/748679 > > I think that's the way to go. That indeed seems as the way to go, i'll try to gather some PCI-id's and e-mail it to bug rep

Re: [Tails-dev] htpdate - Why the perl version?

2014-06-01 Thread intrigeri
AK wrote (31 May 2014 23:53:37 GMT) : > Just wondering why Tails decided to uses the perl version of htpdate > rather than the C version. We had to modify htpdate to make it suit our needs, and it was easier for us to modify the Perl version. Also, unless there are pretty good reasons, using a mem