Re: [Tails-dev] Onion Circuits upstream maintenance

2016-05-10 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Alan, > intrigeri: >> I agree that Tails' Redmine feels like the right place to handle >> this. >> > Me too, and thanks Sascha for your patch ! BTW, I’d be happy to integrate the latest changes (for Tails) into the Debian version if you could tag a new release of Onion Circuits in git. Then

Re: [Tails-dev] Onion Circuits upstream maintenance

2016-03-09 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi all, do you already have a plan wrt. how Onion Circuits shall be maintained upstream, e.g. who is handling proposed contributions? [...] I'm asking because I noticed that Sascha (who did most of the packaging work for Debian so far) has marked a patch he authored as "Forwarded: via email" (

Re: [Tails-dev] Tor Monitor build fails

2015-09-22 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi all, >> As you can see, the tarball is created if it does not exist. Does this work >> for you? >> > No, it doesn't work under Tails (based on wheezy), but I tried under > jessie and the build starts... but then I hit: > > $ gbp buildpackage --git-dist=jessie --git-arch=i386 --git-pbuilder -

Re: [Tails-dev] Package Tor Monitor

2015-08-24 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Alan, >> You are definitely more familiar with the internals of the Python distutils >> steps. >> I am happy with any solution you propose as long as ‘setup.py build’ does not >> generate a new POT file on each build (hence updating the timestamp) >> but reuses a version that is pregenerated b

Re: [Tails-dev] Tor Monitor build fails

2015-08-24 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Alan, > I just tried to build the package and failed: > >$ git-buildpackage --git-debian-branch=debian >dh clean --with python3 --buildsystem=pybuild > dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=pybuild > debian/rules override_dh_auto_clean >make[1]: Entering directory `/home/amnesia/P

Re: [Tails-dev] Package Tor Monitor

2015-08-23 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Alan, […] >> I just I a look at it, and I was wondering : the pot file gets generated >> at build time, so it would'nt be reproducible without some patches to >> the build system (change date of potfile generation for the last >> changelog entry's, or maybe change the upstream work to generate

Re: [Tails-dev] Package Tor Monitor

2015-08-20 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Clement, […] > I just I a look at it, and I was wondering : the pot file gets generated > at build time, so it would'nt be reproducible without some patches to > the build system (change date of potfile generation for the last > changelog entry's, or maybe change the upstream work to generate i

Re: [Tails-dev] Package Tor Monitor

2015-08-20 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi intrigeri, […] > Excellent! Please subscribe to pkg-anonymity-tools and let's continue > this discussion there. [x] Done. I have subscribed this morning. […] >> It’s quite Debian-style (just build with git-buildpackage) — I am not sure >> whether you do things much differently in Tails. > >

Re: [Tails-dev] Package Tor Monitor

2015-08-20 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi all, >> It’s quite Debian-style (just build with git-buildpackage) — I am not sure >> whether you do things much differently in Tails. I can file an ITP if you >> want it in Debian as well. Looking forward to hear what you think. > > In general, we tend to want to use Debian packages and maint

Re: [Tails-dev] Package Tor Monitor

2015-08-19 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi everyone, > I would co-maintain this with nodens and if anyone on the list is > interested.. i can do some handholding. I have been lurking on this ML for a while so I might just break my silence right now. I have done some Debian packaging in the Debian Med team, for now mainly working on bio