Re: [Tails-dev] Documentation about BIOS and firmware attacks

2021-06-28 Thread syster via Tails-dev
Hello :-) > Being a nice market, it is costly, hard to setup, and hard to find, > especially 100% blob free hardware. I am not sure more than a few > percents of the Tails audience would do the switch. If a user has this information, they might consider switching to libre/coreboot once their

Re: [Tails-dev] Documentation about BIOS and firmware attacks

2021-06-27 Thread geb
Hello, syster via Tails-dev: > I've just been reading through the new /doc/about/warnings/. > > It includes "No operating system can protect against BIOS and firmware > attacks" and explains why that is, followed by a suggestion how to > reduce that issue. > > What I'm missing is a hint to use

[Tails-dev] Documentation about BIOS and firmware attacks

2021-06-27 Thread syster via Tails-dev
I've just been reading through the new /doc/about/warnings/. It includes "No operating system can protect against BIOS and firmware attacks" and explains why that is, followed by a suggestion how to reduce that issue. What I'm missing is a hint to use Libre/Coreboot as an option to prevent

Re: [Tails-dev] Documentation?

2014-04-10 Thread Stef Walter
On 24.03.2014 17:44, BitingBird wrote: Hi! I contribute to Tails, and we like to provide documentation about the software we ship. We have a ticket about seahorse documentation (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6568) and I really don't find your documentation anyware. The outdated doc i

Re: [Tails-dev] Documentation?

2014-04-10 Thread Jim Campbell
Hi All, On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Stef Walter st...@gnome.org wrote: On 24.03.2014 17:44, BitingBird wrote: Hi! I contribute to Tails, and we like to provide documentation about the software we ship. We have a ticket about seahorse documentation

Re: [Tails-dev] Documentation?

2014-04-10 Thread BitingBird
The documentation was redone by the documentation project, it has recently been merged for 3.12.0 into master. Are you able to run seahorse 3.12? Cheers, Stef All of the GNOME user help is also available at https://help.gnome.org The user help for Seahorse 3.12 (aka Passwords and

[Tails-dev] Documentation?

2014-03-24 Thread BitingBird
Hi! I contribute to Tails, and we like to provide documentation about the software we ship. We have a ticket about seahorse documentation (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6568) and I really don't find your documentation anyware. The outdated doc i found a few days ago is now offline, and the

Re: [Tails-dev] documentation contribution process too bureaucratic?

2013-07-10 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Alan wrote (06 Jul 2013 15:35:40 GMT) : However, it will probably become irrelevent as soon as we switch to redmine to track issues. Does anybody has an idea when it will happen ? Soon. If it is soon, I propose we ignore the issue. Yes. ___

Re: [Tails-dev] documentation contribution process too bureaucratic?

2013-07-06 Thread Alan
Hi, On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 13:34:30 +0200 intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote: adrelanos wrote (05 Jul 2013 16:25:37 GMT) : Still having the same issue. I could reproduce that, and got the same error message, but in the end my changes *are* saved: only the wiki update was not finished

Re: [Tails-dev] documentation contribution process too bureaucratic?

2013-07-05 Thread intrigeri
Hi, adrelanos wrote (02 Jul 2013 23:04:55 GMT) : Proposing content in the wiki just doesn't work out, probable because the spam filter kicks in and forbids transmission due to many links. What makes you think so? I ended up with a gateway took to long error, which I'll paste below in

Re: [Tails-dev] documentation contribution process too bureaucratic?

2013-04-04 Thread sajolida
A much more reliable way to do so it to be open to contributions, review them and publish them once they are mature. Yes, agreed. That is a good compromise. In wikipedia they (used to) have a feature called sighted versions / flagged revisions. In essence, causal visitors will see by

Re: [Tails-dev] documentation contribution process too bureaucratic?

2013-03-15 Thread sajolida
On 14/03/13 19:38, adrelanos wrote: Hi! I made the assumption, that you'd like to have more people improving documentation and thought may like to get feedback if someone feels that something prevents people from contributing, like I do. Yes, that would be great to have more people writing

[Tails-dev] documentation contribution process too bureaucratic?

2013-03-14 Thread adrelanos
Hi! I made the assumption, that you'd like to have more people improving documentation and thought may like to get feedback if someone feels that something prevents people from contributing, like I do. Taking this as an example todo item: https://tails.boum.org/todo/document_timezone/ Looks

Re: [Tails-dev] documentation - do dont section

2012-12-24 Thread adrelanos
intrigeri: adrelanos wrote (10 Dec 2012 21:36:37 GMT) : Is this (part) of what you are looking for? I've no idea what we had in mind exactly when opening this ticket of ours, but I think this is the basic idea, yeah! What seems clear to me is that what we want would be targeted at

Re: [Tails-dev] documentation - do dont section

2012-12-24 Thread adrelanos
adrelanos: At the moment absolutely Whonix agnostic. I hope and think I can leave it that way. It's just about the social part. Almost remained that way. The headline Prevent Tor over Tor scenarios. says Whonix specific and should probable just be deleted for Tails. The other two times, where

Re: [Tails-dev] documentation - do dont section

2012-12-12 Thread intrigeri
adrelanos wrote (10 Dec 2012 21:36:37 GMT) : Is this (part) of what you are looking for? I've no idea what we had in mind exactly when opening this ticket of ours, but I think this is the basic idea, yeah! What seems clear to me is that what we want would be targeted at end-users, so we would

Re: [Tails-dev] documentation - do dont section

2012-12-12 Thread anonym
10/12/12 22:36, adrelanos wrote: Hi! Tails ticket: https://tails.boum.org/todo/do_dont_section/ I am writing: https://sourceforge.net/p/whonix/wiki/DoNot/ At the moment absolutely Whonix agnostic. I hope and think I can leave it that way. It's just about the social part. Is this

[Tails-dev] documentation - do dont section

2012-12-10 Thread adrelanos
Hi! Tails ticket: https://tails.boum.org/todo/do_dont_section/ I am writing: https://sourceforge.net/p/whonix/wiki/DoNot/ At the moment absolutely Whonix agnostic. I hope and think I can leave it that way. It's just about the social part. Is this (part) of what you are looking for? If you like

Re: [Tails-dev] Documentation : proposed improvements

2012-09-26 Thread sajolida
On 02/05/12 11:57, sam_tn...@hushmail.com wrote: Hello, When installing tails for the first time yesterday, i was a bit lost in the documentation. Here's the path I followed : Documentation Get Tails. Here I get and verified the Tails image, it was OK. But then : First steps with Tails.

Re: [Tails-dev] Documentation : proposed improvements

2012-05-25 Thread sajolida
sam_tn...@hushmail.com: Hello, When installing tails for the first time yesterday, i was a bit lost in the documentation. Here's the path I followed : Documentation Get Tails. Here I get and verified the Tails image, it was OK. But then : First steps with Tails. It's never said in the

Re: [Tails-dev] Documentation : proposed improvements

2012-05-25 Thread intrigeri
sajolida wrote (25 May 2012 13:00:57 GMT) : So maybe we should use different widgets to provide those two features. My plan was to use the trail plugin to provide navigation through the index. But on top of that we will probably also need to add manually some entries to support the mental

[Tails-dev] documentation work for Tails 0.11

2012-03-21 Thread sajolida
Hi everybody, As you can see, we're actively working on preparing the upcoming Tails 0.11. It will include tons of exciting, and long expected features: - a graphical startup interface for changing many options - a graphical installer for USB sticks - a tool to setup a persistent storage on the

Re: [Tails-dev] documentation work for Tails 0.11

2012-03-21 Thread intrigeri
sajolida wrote (21 Mar 2012 18:38:02 GMT) : - Resetting a USB stick, for Linux - Resetting a USB stick, for Windows This will document how to reset a USB stick to a good-old MBR + FAT32 partition table. That's sometimes required when the USB installer doesn't manage to overwrite a

Re: [Tails-dev] Documentation (re)writing / translation process

2011-12-05 Thread sajolida
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 intrigeri: hi, sajolida wrote (30 Nov 2011 18:28:32 GMT) : Maybe a solution would be to post this info on the mailing list every time we do a big merge. Would could also have this summary added to some kind of changelog in the wiki if posting