Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins

2013-09-07 Thread intrigeri
berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (06 Sep 2013 19:28:03 GMT) : Jeez, i didn't thought this commit msg was so important that it required to rewrite the whole history. To my eyes, it looked like the last commit in a feature branch that had not been merged into any branch with never rewritten

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins

2013-09-06 Thread bertagaz
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:02:19PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: (seems like I haven't sent this email yet, oh.) berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (03 Sep 2013 19:04:38 GMT) : All remarks have been corrected in a commit pushed in the same branch. I've tentatively merged this into my local

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins

2013-09-06 Thread intrigeri
berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (06 Sep 2013 16:15:41 GMT) : Ready to be merged into the remaining branches for a final review round. I was going to merge into the other branches and push to lizard, but I'll let you turn the (obviously temporary) message of commit 500710 into something

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins

2013-09-06 Thread bertagaz
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 08:30:45PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (06 Sep 2013 16:15:41 GMT) : Ready to be merged into the remaining branches for a final review round. I was going to merge into the other branches and push to lizard, but I'll let you turn the

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins

2013-09-04 Thread intrigeri
(seems like I haven't sent this email yet, oh.) berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (03 Sep 2013 19:04:38 GMT) : All remarks have been corrected in a commit pushed in the same branch. I've tentatively merged this into my local stable, devel, experimental feature/wheezy, then pushed *to lizard*,

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins

2013-09-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (02 Sep 2013 10:59:48 GMT) : Branch: feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins Ticket: #6248 (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6248) 64f39f1 Use more unique iso name when building from jenkins. This commit introduces more unique iso name when

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins

2013-09-03 Thread bertagaz
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:03:48PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (02 Sep 2013 10:59:48 GMT) : Branch: feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins Ticket: #6248 (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6248) 64f39f1 Use more unique iso name when building from

[Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins

2013-09-02 Thread bertagaz
Hi, Branch: feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins Ticket: #6248 (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6248) 64f39f1 Use more unique iso name when building from jenkins. This commit introduces more unique iso name when building in jenkins so that we will be able to keep several isos per