Hi,
Branch: feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins
Ticket: #6248 (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6248)
64f39f1 Use more unique iso name when building from jenkins.
This commit introduces more unique iso name when building in jenkins so
that we will be able to keep several isos per day
Hi,
berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (02 Sep 2013 10:59:48 GMT) :
> Branch: feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins
> Ticket: #6248 (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6248)
> 64f39f1 Use more unique iso name when building from jenkins.
> This commit introduces more unique iso name when bu
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:03:48PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (02 Sep 2013 10:59:48 GMT) :
> > Branch: feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins
> > Ticket: #6248 (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6248)
>
> > 64f39f1 Use more unique iso name when buil
(seems like I haven't sent this email yet, oh.)
berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (03 Sep 2013 19:04:38 GMT) :
> All remarks have been corrected in a commit pushed in the same branch.
I've tentatively merged this into my local stable, devel, experimental
& feature/wheezy, then pushed *to lizard*,
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:02:19PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> (seems like I haven't sent this email yet, oh.)
>
> berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (03 Sep 2013 19:04:38 GMT) :
> > All remarks have been corrected in a commit pushed in the same branch.
>
> I've tentatively merged this into my local
berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (06 Sep 2013 16:15:41 GMT) :
> Ready to be merged into the remaining branches for a final review round.
I was going to merge into the other branches and push to lizard, but
I'll let you turn the (obviously temporary) message of commit 500710
into something meaning
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 08:30:45PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (06 Sep 2013 16:15:41 GMT) :
> > Ready to be merged into the remaining branches for a final review round.
>
> I was going to merge into the other branches and push to lizard, but
> I'll let you turn the
berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (06 Sep 2013 19:28:03 GMT) :
> Jeez, i didn't thought this commit msg was so important that it required
> to rewrite the whole history.
To my eyes, it looked like the last commit in a feature branch that
had not been merged into any branch with never rewritten his
I've had Jenkins build stable, devel and feature/wheezy with this
branch in too, works fine!
Merged into stable, devel and feature/wheezy :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/int
