Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-08 Thread intrigeri
sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (07 Oct 2012 08:51:24 GMT) : > Great! I fixed the language a bit with commit 4e08074. I fixed some grammar and merged again into devel. Will push soon. (I think such doc / style / grammar fixes, for already-merged branches, could be done directly in devel.) __

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-07 Thread sajolida
On 02/10/12 15:14, anonym wrote: > 30/09/12 21:01, intrigeri wrote: >> Hi, >> >> please, anyone who did the 0.18 release of tails-persistence-setup, >> push your pristine-tar branch. > > I followed the instructions in > contribute/release_process/persistence-setup, and that branch wasn't > modifie

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-04 Thread intrigeri
>> Don't wait for me, I am convinced as well. > Same here :) Merged. Adapted the network connections preset's name in the bundled doc. ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-04 Thread bertagaz
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 05:33:18PM +, Ague Mill wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:21:05PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > > intrigeri wrote (03 Oct 2012 17:30:10 GMT) : > > > anonym wrote (03 Oct 2012 14:34:59 GMT) : > > >> So, with the current state of things it still looks like a bug to > > >> me

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-04 Thread Ague Mill
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:21:05PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > intrigeri wrote (03 Oct 2012 17:30:10 GMT) : > > anonym wrote (03 Oct 2012 14:34:59 GMT) : > >> So, with the current state of things it still looks like a bug to > >> me, although with nice side-effects. Making it into a proper feature >

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-03 Thread intrigeri
intrigeri wrote (03 Oct 2012 17:30:10 GMT) : > anonym wrote (03 Oct 2012 14:34:59 GMT) : >> So, with the current state of things it still looks like a bug to >> me, although with nice side-effects. Making it into a proper feature >> (i.e. patching nm-applet) is definitely desirable, but not somethi

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-03 Thread intrigeri
hi, anonym wrote (03 Oct 2012 14:34:59 GMT) : > So, with the current state of things it still looks like a bug to > me, although with nice side-effects. Making it into a proper feature > (i.e. patching nm-applet) is definitely desirable, but not something > I'm willing to take on for the 0.14 rele

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-03 Thread intrigeri
hi, anonym wrote (03 Oct 2012 14:34:53 GMT) : > Or can the rephrasing just live in git and be released as t-p-s 0.19 > during the Tails 0.14 freeze when the translations has been done? I'm fine with that. Will you take care of make this happen? >> Also, any thoughts about how we'll handle the mi

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-03 Thread anonym
02/10/12 16:09, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > anonym wrote (02 Oct 2012 13:14:58 GMT) : >> 30/09/12 21:01, intrigeri wrote: >>> please, anyone who did the 0.18 release of tails-persistence-setup, >>> push your pristine-tar branch. > >> I followed the instructions in >> contribute/release_process/per

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-03 Thread anonym
02/10/12 16:08, Ague Mill wrote: >> Since live-persist is the glue that fixes all the quirks we have >> with live-boot's vanilla persistence, this seems like a perfect fit. >> This is done in commits 77c3261 and 4db38e9. > > Looks nicer this way. > > The function `fix_gconf_dirs` might bene

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-02 Thread alan
> From: anonym > Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 15:14:58 +0200 > [...] > > If the rest of you agree that all is good now, please review and merge > this branch into devel so it can be included in Tails 0.14. > Please merge the new state of this branch to experimental. And, by the way, is there a good

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-02 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Ague Mill wrote (02 Oct 2012 14:08:05 GMT) : >> * "Connect automatically" checkbox gets unchecked on each boot: IMHO >> this bug is good :). Hence we can ignore this for now and just >> mention it as a known issue (commit 0f7f652). > We have to rule this as either a bug or a feature. In m

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-02 Thread intrigeri
Hi, anonym wrote (02 Oct 2012 13:14:58 GMT) : > 30/09/12 21:01, intrigeri wrote: >> please, anyone who did the 0.18 release of tails-persistence-setup, >> push your pristine-tar branch. > I followed the instructions in > contribute/release_process/persistence-setup, and that branch wasn't > modif

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-02 Thread Ague Mill
> Since live-persist is the glue that fixes all the quirks we have > with live-boot's vanilla persistence, this seems like a perfect fit. > This is done in commits 77c3261 and 4db38e9. Looks nicer this way. The function `fix_gconf_dirs` might benefit from some more quoting of the variables.

[Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-02 Thread anonym
30/09/12 21:01, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > please, anyone who did the 0.18 release of tails-persistence-setup, > push your pristine-tar branch. I followed the instructions in contribute/release_process/persistence-setup, and that branch wasn't modified (i.e. it's still at commit 0bc2057). How can