> I do not know how Tails is supposed to persist software installed via
> debian packages...
That part is easy, if the apt stuff is persisted, it is as simple as
adding the package name to
/live/persistence/TailsData_unlocked/live-additional-software.conf
I do this for emacs because I'm like
> Looks good. Still, will need to persist the Tahoe-LAFS configuration.
> Hence my proposal.
Ahhh OK! I understand.
> Have you actually tried installing Tahoe-LAFS on Tails, in a way that
> it's re-installed automatically on every boot, and you don't have to
> reconfigure it every time you start
Hi,
David Stainton wrote (05 Jun 2014 16:58:52 GMT) :
> Since you didn't read the entire thread... I want to make it
> explicitly clear that there is most definitely not one "proper
> integration" design for Tails and Tahoe-LAFS... AND Tahoe-LAFS
> cannot help with persistence... wrong tool for th
> (Disclaimer: I still have not read this full thread.)
OK...
>> is there any reason not to?
>
> If someone properly integrates Tahoe-LAFS withing Tails (including
> patching tails-persistence-setup, design doc, and whatever nobody has
> thought of yet), then I'm happy.
Since you didn't read the
Hi,
(Disclaimer: I still have not read this full thread.)
David Stainton wrote (05 Jun 2014 13:28:21 GMT) :
> I think what Zooko is suggesting is that the Tahoe-LAFS debian
> package be included in the Tails releases.
Thanks for clarifying.
> Now that we have debian packages and a maintainer
.
> Additionally, on any relevant Debian system, the command-line sftp
> client is shipped as part of the openssh-client package, that is
> installed in Tails.
>
>> Does it come with a Bittorrent client?
>
> No: https://tails.boum.org/support/faq/#index22h2
>
>> Can we make Tahoe-LAFS be the third th
Hi,
[Snipping large chunks of discussion about how various kinds of
downloads are advertised on the Tahoe-LAFS website, as I fail to see
what it has to do with Tails. It might be because I've not catched up
with the rest of this thread yet.]
Zooko Wilcox-OHearn wrote (03 Jun 2014 18:18:16 GMT) :
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Leif Ryge wrote:
… many interesting things, including his sketch for a successor to, or
extension of, Tahoe-LAFS (chisel) …
> ***
> *** BACK TO THE NEAR FUTURE ***
> ***
…
> I look forward to seeing Tahoe
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> This can be viewed as a bug in tahoe :-)
> But seriously, fixing the FUSE interface would be a great contribution.
> It's not clear to me how efficient the FUSE interface has to be before
> it isn't the limiting issue; tahoe is not a fast file
Hi, I'm a Tahoe-LAFS core dev. I'm excited about the possibility of
Tahoe-LAFS becoming really useful to Tails users, and I'm grateful to
others, especially David Stainton, for moving this forward.
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 12:46 PM, David Stainton wrote:
>> Tahoe documentation could mention this:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:11:29AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> David Stainton writes:
>
> > Since Tahoe-LAFS is not a posix compliant filesystem...
> > we cannot easily create a persistent volume that only
> > stores data on a Tahoe grid. There is an ugly FUSE hack
> > but it is extremely ineffie
David Stainton writes:
> Since Tahoe-LAFS is not a posix compliant filesystem...
> we cannot easily create a persistent volume that only
> stores data on a Tahoe grid. There is an ugly FUSE hack
> but it is extremely ineffient.
This can be viewed as a bug in tahoe :-)
But seriously, fixing the F
>> 1. the Tahoe-LAFS debian package:
>>
>> This part is done. Great!
>>
> Congratulation :)
> Tahoe documentation could mention this:
> https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/docs/quickstart.rst
OK... I volunteer to update
https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/docs/quickstart.rst
David Stainton:
> Hi,
> [...]
> 1. the Tahoe-LAFS debian package:
>
> This part is done. Great!
>
Congratulation :)
Tahoe documentation could mention this:
https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/docs/quickstart.rst
> 2. Tails persistent volume assistant feature additions:
>
> Right now
Hi,
I need your input, ideas and suggestions with regards to Tahoe-LAFS +
Tails integration.
The Tails trac ticket is 6227, https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6227
I propose that the Tahoe-LAFS + Tails integration would involve these
4 components:
1. the Tahoe-LAFS debian package:
This part is
15 matches
Mail list logo
