Hi,
David Wolinsky wrote (03 Jan 2014 18:58:52 GMT) :
> If we want Tails host and guest VM to share the same image, we need to
> figure out a means to get the VM running without loading Tor and having
> applications reference the http proxy as well as other anonymity
> components, such as ttdnsd (
Hi David,
intrigeri wrote (06 Jan 2014 19:17:57 GMT) :
>> One favor I ask of you is if you could point me to some
>> documentation that enumerates what all this might be.
> I'm afraid we have anything better than our design doc:
>https://tails.boum.org/contribute/design/
> ... and the sub-p
Hi,
Sina S wrote (24 Jan 2014 00:41:28 GMT) :
> I am a little worried about this proposal because it will mean computers
> without a lot of resources can no longer run Tails.
Thanks for writing down this concern. I'm sure a few of us (including
me) share it too.
However, AFAIK, nobody has ever p
On 19 December 2013 14:14, David Wolinsky wrote:
> Per the thread on the Tor tracker (
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7681), I want to start
> working on integrating the of Pseudonymity as defined by WiNoN into Tails.
> Namely, users run multiple, independent VMs connected to i
Hi,
sorry for the delay.
David Wolinsky wrote (29 Dec 2013 06:11:29 GMT) :
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 3:56 PM, intrigeri wrote:
>> - How does this play with our stream isolation design [1]?
>> In other words, what kind of SocksPort(s), with what stream
>> isolation options, would the TCP traf
If we want Tails host and guest VM to share the same image, we need to
figure out a means to get the VM running without loading Tor and having
applications reference the http proxy as well as other anonymity
components, such as ttdnsd (Tor DNS daemon). This isn't an easy task as
there are many mean
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 3:56 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Wolinsky wrote (19 Dec 2013 03:14:39 GMT) :
> > I want to start working on integrating the of Pseudonymity as
> > defined by WiNoN into Tails.
>
> I'm very happy to see someone work on this.
>
> > To do this I propose the following
Hi,
David Wolinsky wrote (20 Dec 2013 03:37:15 GMT) :
> I spoke with a colleague today and we discussed the following:
> - Initially we'll target a single VM running full screen using KVM
So, this is the Pseudonym VM, right? And you mean only one concurrent
Pseudonym VM will be supported to start
Hi,
David Wolinsky wrote (19 Dec 2013 03:14:39 GMT) :
> I want to start working on integrating the of Pseudonymity as
> defined by WiNoN into Tails.
I'm very happy to see someone work on this.
> To do this I propose the following:
> - In the host, we run redsocks (http://darkk.net.ru/redsocks/)
I spoke with a colleague today and we discussed the following:
- Initially we'll target a single VM running full screen using KVM
- Worry about LXC at the end
- Different network model:
option 1) KVM uses NATs, use IPTables process id matching to redirect
packets to a specific redsocks instance and
Per the thread on the Tor tracker (
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7681), I want to start
working on integrating the of Pseudonymity as defined by WiNoN into Tails.
Namely, users run multiple, independent VMs connected to independent paths
through the Tor network in order to wear m
11 matches
Mail list logo
