Re: [GTALUG] GTALUG

2019-03-14 Thread Sammy Lao via talk
I had to google what JBP stand for. I still have the same sense of decorum now as back in Usenet days when everybody just gave out their email address in a public forum -- don't email people you found on Usenet unless they invited you or you are friends. Preferably in real life. That is insane.

Re: [GTALUG] Western Digital's open source RISC-V core

2019-03-14 Thread Stewart Russell via talk
Yeah, I think it is. This link from Seeedstudio (a well respected open hardware company, and yes, they have 3 Es) has all the goods, including super-tiny Linux boards: https://www.seeedstudio.com/sipeed Cheers Stewart > --- Talk Mailing List talk@gtalug.org

Re: [GTALUG] Western Digital's open source RISC-V core

2019-03-14 Thread Daniel Wayne Armstrong via talk
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 4:14 PM Christopher Browne via talk wrote: > I think it's the Liche Tang that Chris was referencing when he mentioned a > "$17 board". AliExpress sells it for $31 CAD; I'm not sure where to get it > for $17, and that might be $17 USD. > Chris mentioned it was offered by

Re: [GTALUG] reverse engineering

2019-03-14 Thread David Collier-Brown via talk
On 2019-03-14 3:40 p.m., Kevin Cozens via talk wrote: I've tried several decompilers but they didn't work, or wouldn't even compile. I looked at boomerang, Hopper, snowman, retdec, and reko. The ones that work wouldn't handle the architecture. The ghidra decompiler has been the only one that

Re: [GTALUG] Western Digital's open source RISC-V core

2019-03-14 Thread Christopher Browne via talk
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 15:30, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote: > I assume that you can put this on a FPGA, as Chris Tyler talked about on > Tuesday. I haven't checked this. I think that it is in verilog, but I'm > not sure. > > >

Re: [GTALUG] Western Digital's open source RISC-V core

2019-03-14 Thread Kevin Cozens via talk
On 2019-03-14 3:30 p.m., D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote: I assume that you can put this on a FPGA, as Chris Tyler talked about on Tuesday. I haven't checked this. I think that it is in verilog, but I'm not sure. Yes, it is in Verilog. It could be put on any FPGA that has enough logic

Re: [GTALUG] reverse engineering

2019-03-14 Thread Kevin Cozens via talk
On 2019-03-09 6:06 p.m., D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote: Sometimes I get annoyed at binaries for which I don't have any code. [snip] One way to pry these open is through reverse engineering tools What prompts this message is that the NSA has just released Ghindra as open source. [snip]

[GTALUG] Western Digital's open source RISC-V core

2019-03-14 Thread D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk
I assume that you can put this on a FPGA, as Chris Tyler talked about on Tuesday. I haven't checked this. I think that it is in verilog, but I'm not sure. There's also an emulator:

Re: [GTALUG] Microsoft open sources Windows Calculator

2019-03-14 Thread James Knott via talk
On 03/11/2019 11:59 AM, Kevin Cozens via talk wrote: > On 2019-03-10 12:19 p.m., James Knott via talk wrote: >> Forgot to mention, the first editor I used was SCELBI's "ED", a simple >> line editor, which was better than that Pr1me editor.  I used ED on my >> IMSAI 8080. >> >>

[GTALUG] notebook deal TODAY (Pi Day)

2019-03-14 Thread D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk
The Microsoft Store seems to have good deals on Dell XPS 13 and XPS 15 notebooks with UltraHD displays. I really like the idea of an UltraHD display, but you might not find it useful.

Re: [GTALUG] GTALUG

2019-03-14 Thread Alex Volkov via talk
Hey Karen, We are going to review all moderation decision at Monday board meeting. Please forward us all the emails you receive from members forcing their case to bo...@gtalug.org. Alex. On 2019-03-14 12:40 p.m., Karen Lewellen via talk wrote:  Can someone explain the rules about private

Re: [GTALUG] GTALUG

2019-03-14 Thread Russell Reiter via talk
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, 12:40 PM Karen Lewellen via talk, wrote: > Can someone explain the rules about private contacts without permission? > It seems those on moderation are simply trying to force their case > privately. > Generally when a list is moderated, the organization providing the

Re: [GTALUG] GTALUG

2019-03-14 Thread Karen Lewellen via talk
Can someone explain the rules about private contacts without permission? It seems those on moderation are simply trying to force their case privately. On Thu, 14 Mar 2019, ted leslie wrote: I got booted (life time) as you may know. I found your posts in the archive. First, I am NOT