Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] access=license

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Charles Basenga Kiyanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Parking lots of this kind are common enough (in inner cities) that >>> they have >>> their own official traffic sign (number 9 at [1]), but there's >>> currently no >>> good way to tag them. >>> >>> >> >> We h

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] access=license

>> Parking lots of this kind are common enough (in inner cities) that >> they have >> their own official traffic sign (number 9 at [1]), but there's >> currently no >> good way to tag them. >> >> > > We have similar (but more complex signs as the tend to include the > parking permit zon

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] access=license

On 24 May 2008, at 18:23, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > Hi all, > > In the Netherlands there's a number of parking lots where you can > only park > if you have a valid parking license from the local government. This common in UK cities too, though we use the name parking permit. > > > P

Re: [OSM-talk] URL for trace pages?

OJ W wrote: > there is another page of computer-readable details: > http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/gpx/114312/details http://www.openstreetmap.org/trace/114312/data.xml will get you the trace without the username, if that helps. cheers Richard

[OSM-talk] [tagging] access=license

Hi all, In the Netherlands there's a number of parking lots where you can only park if you have a valid parking license from the local government. Parking lots of this kind are common enough (in inner cities) that they have their own official traffic sign (number 9 at [1]), but there's current

Re: [OSM-talk] Osmarender problem

Hi David, > Apologies if this is the wrong place to post, or just a stupid question. > > Trying to use Osmarender, have all the bits that are needed, yet when I run > the following from the command line ... > > C:\>msxsl osm-map-features-z17.xml -pi -o map.svg Didnt you want to run: msxsl osmare

Re: [OSM-talk] Mulltipolygons and Mapnik

Dermot McNally wrote: > 2008/5/23 Chris Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> I've worked with islands before. It seems that the key points are: >> 1. make sure that the same tag is used on the inner and outer, in this case >> natural=water >> 2. Make sure that the outer is clockwise and inner(s) are

Re: [OSM-talk] Mulltipolygons and Mapnik

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Dermot McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's worth a try, and we'll know in a week, but I'm not so sure this > will cure the problem. Otherwise, how do you explain the island that > already was tagged the same but still didn't render on the mapnik > layer? I'm a

[OSM-talk] URL for trace pages?

is there a reason that you have to know the username before browsing to the OSM page for a GPX trace? e.g. the URL like this works: http://openstreetmap.org/user/MAPconcierge/traces/114312 but why doesn't the URL like this also work? http://openstreetmap.org/trace/114312 there is another pag

[OSM-talk] Osmarender problem

Hello Talk Apologies if this is the wrong place to post, or just a stupid question. Trying to use Osmarender, have all the bits that are needed, yet when I run the following from the command line ... C:\>msxsl osm-map-features-z17.xml -pi -o map.svg .. I get Code: 0x80004005 Unknown method.

Re: [OSM-talk] Transparent slippy map of a GPX - benchmarks

For a -point tracklog, the tileserver approach takes about 140 ms per tile to render. When it needs to download a tracklog that it's never seen before, that takes about 800ms. Tiles that don't intersect with the tracklog bounding box (completely transparent ones) take 3-4ms. Timings measured

[OSM-talk] Point of interests: Paid and open Wireless Hotspots

Hello Merkaartor is a quite good tool to edit OpenMaps. The move of the map-picture in the frame, could be better with the arrows maybe? I want to suggest to add to the Point of Interests the two following categories for OpenMaps in General: