>> i agree with you!
>> my idea of how this should be rendered is:
>> grade1: just like highway=service
>> [...]
>It's worth noting that tracktype is not a universally welcome tag - a
>lot of people think having an arbitrary scale isn't very "OSM-like",
>and that it's better to tag specific char
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>>> i agree with you! my idea of how this should be rendered is:
>>> grade1: just like highway=service [...]
>
>> It's worth noting that tracktype is not a universally welcome tag -
>> a lot of people think having an arbitrary scale isn't very
>> "OSM-like", and that it's be
Andy Allan wrote:
> Meh. It's on my list of things to do, but to be honest I don't see it
> as very important. There's lots of things that the cycle map doesn't
> render at all, and for one I see distinguishing onroad/offroad cycle
> routes as more important than the difference between tracktypes;
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 04:43:36AM -0700, Alex S. wrote:
> Andy Allan wrote:
> > Meh. It's on my list of things to do, but to be honest I don't see it
> > as very important. There's lots of things that the cycle map doesn't
> > render at all, and for one I see distinguishing onroad/offroad cycle
>
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Alex S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andy Allan wrote:
> > Meh. It's on my list of things to do, but to be honest I don't see it
> > as very important. There's lots of things that the cycle map doesn't
> > render at all, and for one I see distinguishing onroad/offr
Hi,
> Umm... According to Map_Features, tracks are ALWAYS unpaved:
> "unpaved/unsealed roads for agricultural use; gravel roads in the
> forest etc." There, your problem's solved--just avoid all tracks.
I have fixed Map_Features.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Karl Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Umm... According to Map_Features, tracks are ALWAYS unpaved
If this would be the case, what should be use for an agricultural serviceway
(probably bad word by word translation of the german term
"Landwirtschaftlicher Weg")?
We have a whole lot of them her
Am Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2008 12:11:48 schrieb Frank Sautter:
> Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> >>> i agree with you! my idea of how this should be rendered is:
> >>> grade1: just like highway=service [...]
> >>
> >> It's worth noting that tracktype is not a universally welcome tag -
> >> a lot of people th
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Tag:highway=track and the map
features mentioned track is only for unpaved/unsealed roads. To me it
looks like it was approved like that, so please don't "fix" approved
descriptions before having a discussion and a vote first...
Greetings
Ben
On Thursd
>
anyone (in germany?) able to help this guy pls reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> }
> } Do you mind if I forward this to the relevant list? I'm sure someone
> } will help.
> }
> } On 5 Jun 2008, at 00:37, Alan & Carol Morris wrote:
> }
> } > Greetings Steve,
> } >
> } > I always save my track
Sven Geggus wrote:
> We have a whole lot of them here in germany and they are usually
> paved or asphaltic ways, and they are different from unclassified, because
> they are usually narrow and have access for tractors and bykes only.
>
> They are simular to a highway=service, which I tended to use
Hi,
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Tag:highway=track and the map
> features mentioned track is only for unpaved/unsealed roads. To me it
> looks like it was approved like that, so please don't "fix" approved
> descriptions before having a discussion and a vote first...
Map Features
Ben Laenen schrieb:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Tag:highway=track and the map
features mentioned track is only for unpaved/unsealed roads. To me it
looks like it was approved like that, so please don't "fix" approved
descriptions before having a discussion and a vote first...
Most
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Tag:highway=track and the map
>> features mentioned track is only for unpaved/unsealed roads. To me it looks
>> like it was approved like that, so please don't "fix" approv
Karl Newman schrieb:
So now I decide that since I drive really fast down my driveway, I should
call it highway=motorway and start tagging driveways that way. Since that's
"how it's used", I'm going to change Map Features to reflect that. Okay,
that's a bit extreme, but really, care should be tak
Hi,
> So now I decide that since I drive really fast down my driveway, I should
> call it highway=motorway and start tagging driveways that way. Since that's
> "how it's used", I'm going to change Map Features to reflect that. Okay,
> that's a bit extreme, but really, care should be taken when cha
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Christoph Eckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > So now I decide that since I drive really fast down my driveway, I should
> > call it highway=motorway and start tagging driveways that way. Since
> that's
> > "how it's used", I'm going to change Map Feature
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Dirk-Lüder Kreie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Karl Newman schrieb:
>
> So now I decide that since I drive really fast down my driveway, I should
>> call it highway=motorway and start tagging driveways that way. Since
>> that's
>> "how it's used", I'm going to cha
Hi,
> It also shouldn't play host to graffiti.
well, it's wiki so you can revert it. Some call it edit war, though :-) .
Best regards,
ce
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Hi,
> What's the threshold for "widespread use"?
IMHO map features should one day be replaced by a page fed by regular tagwatch
outputs, enriched by manual comments on the tags. Mappers then would see what
other mappers use most.
Just my two cents,
ce
___
Karl Newman schrieb:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Christoph Eckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
of course "map features" defines a kind of lingua franca for all mappers.
But
any language is subject to change. It's not a bible.
It also shouldn't play host to graffiti.
Funny that you thi
Yes, it was always designed for use with openlayers tiles
Thanks to Sebastian, who fixed the slippy.html today to display
pyrender tiles (typically pyrender is run as its own application, and
it starts serving tiles on http://localhost:1280/layer/z/x/y.png )
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applicati
Hi,
> What if I get a bunch of other nutters to help me? :-D What's the
> threshold for "widespread use"?
You could hold a vote on that ;-)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
talk mailing list
Hi everyone!
There is a new RFC which you can find here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Emergency_access_point
I like to open a discussion about this tag and hope for approval (hoping this
is the right procedure how to enter a RFC since I'm new to the osm-talk
mailin
On Thursday 12 June 2008 16:44:04 Sven Geggus wrote:
> We have a whole lot of them here in germany and they are usually
> paved or asphaltic ways, and they are different from unclassified, because
> they are usually narrow and have access for tractors and bykes only.
If it is wide enough to be acc
Hi,
> If there is some legal reason for it to be only accessible by bikes and
> tractors, then you'll need to use access restrictions
> (access=no;agriculture=yes;bicycle=yes;foot=yes) anyway, as there is nothing
> that says normal cars are not allowed to use tracks of grade1
I don't know if t
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Template:Proposal_Page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposal_Page_test___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
2008/6/13 Nicholas Vetrovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Template:Proposal_Page
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposal_Page_test
looks good - certainly saves time, and hopefully incites people to
include all the information they can - some proposals
hi,
I have added some general comments to the discussion on golf here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Talk:Proposed_features/
Golf_course#General_comments
I would appreciate feedback on this.
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Associate, NRC-FOSS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://nrcfosshelpline.i
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 05:11:18PM +0200, Ben Laenen wrote:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Tag:highway=track and the map
> features mentioned track is only for unpaved/unsealed roads. To me it
> looks like it was approved like that, so please don't "fix" approved
> descriptions bef
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:34:06AM -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
> So now I decide that since I drive really fast down my driveway, I should
> call it highway=motorway and start tagging driveways that way. Since that's
> "how it's used", I'm going to change Map Features to reflect that. Okay,
> that's
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:18 PM, spaetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:34:06AM -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
>
> > So now I decide that since I drive really fast down my driveway, I should
> > call it highway=motorway and start tagging driveways that way. Since
> that's
> > "
All,
1) On Sunday we will have a team of Italian OSM activistis, together with
GFOSS.it members and AGA Verona members in the old city centre of Verona.
Romeo is still negotiating with Juliet to check if he will be allowed to join
the crew ;)
If you happen to be close by (e.g. west side of th
spaetz schreef:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 05:11:18PM +0200, Ben Laenen wrote:
>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Tag:highway=track and the map
>> features mentioned track is only for unpaved/unsealed roads. To me it
>> looks like it was approved like that, so please don't "fix" appro
Cartinus schreef:
> On Thursday 12 June 2008 16:44:04 Sven Geggus wrote:
>
>> We have a whole lot of them here in germany and they are usually
>> paved or asphaltic ways, and they are different from unclassified, because
>> they are usually narrow and have access for tractors and bykes only.
>>
Sven Geggus schreef:
> Karl Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Umm... According to Map_Features, tracks are ALWAYS unpaved
>>
>
> If this would be the case, what should be use for an agricultural serviceway
> (probably bad word by word translation of the german term
> "Landwirtschaftl
36 matches
Mail list logo
