Etienne wrote:
> There have been some reports of invoices not being received - probably
> due to spam filtering.
I have filters, but I keep all the spam. (Several GB of it.) I've
searched back through the relevant time area and can't find this message.
> invoice then please let me know and I'll r
Ben Laenen wrote:
> What about routes that don't follow roads? I've been on walking routes
> that send you straight through a grass field, or through a lot of trees
> with no visible path, just marks on the trees.
>
> Greetings
> Ben
>
>
highway = footway?
Igor
--
http://igorbrejc.net
___
2008/6/28 Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Oh, and BTW and another question: Why can't a police-station cover an
>> entire area, but is restricted to a single node?
this is probably just the presets in potlatch - they don't reflect all
the possible combinations at the moment
> If you want to
Gervase
An invoice with payment instructions was sent to you on May 12th. Sending
details were:
Date: Mon May 12 12:54:28 2008
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: State of the Map Conference Registration - Invoice
There have been some reports of invoices not being received - probably due
to spam filt
After I signed up for SOTM, I received an email on the 6th of May saying:
"You will receive a further email soon providing details of how to pay
your registration fee."
It is now the 29th of June and I have not yet received this email, nor
have I received a reply to two further "Ahem? I'd like to
I'm not saying you're wrong, but I hope you at least see a few small problems :
1. Mappers may not think about coming from the other side and forget
to split. (unless the validator flags it).
2. The more split ways we have, the more difficult it is to keep all
the tags up to date (esp outside downl
Hi,
> I've create an proposal for turn restrictions. It's at
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relation:xrestriction
I see no problem in splitting a way at an intersection where it
is part of a turn restriction, thus nicely solving all ambiguity.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMa
Ways NS and EW cross at X. Tell me how to encode all these combinations :
1. I travel North in NS and turn left at X
2. I travel North in NS and turn right at X
3. I travel North in NS straight through X
4. I travel North in NS and make a U-turn at X
Now replace 'North' with 'South' and you have 8
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Nic Roets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've create an proposal for turn restrictions. It's at
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relation:xrestriction
>
I do not see how
"Relation:restriction does not allow mappers to unambiguously
specify any of the 16
2008/6/29 Joerg Ostertag (OSM Munich/Germany) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sonntag 29 Juni 2008, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>my girlfriend just came up with the best ever term for OSM activities
>> in Germany: Krautsourcing ;-)
>
> Doesn't sound nice for us Germans ...
> http://de.wikipedia
On Sonntag 29 Juni 2008, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
>my girlfriend just came up with the best ever term for OSM activities
> in Germany: Krautsourcing ;-)
Doesn't sound nice for us Germans ...
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krauts
--
Jörg (Germany, Tettnang)
http://www.ostertag.name/
I've create an proposal for turn restrictions. It's at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relation:xrestriction
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Hi,
my girlfriend just came up with the best ever term for OSM activities
in Germany: Krautsourcing ;-)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://li
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Chris Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John McKerrell wrote:
> > On 27 Jun 2008, at 22:44, John McKerrell wrote:
> >
> >> version without the background for tomorrow. I'm going on a trial
> >> flight and am hoping to get the flying school interested in the
> >> pr
14 matches
Mail list logo
